12th man Collingwood? I presume your only doing that to boost his ego...Collingwood would get nowhere near World XI selection if the selectors have any brains.Neil Pickup said:I wouldn't even be sure his elbow will have recovered by then - it only seems to work against Bangladesh at the moment...
Strauss
Sehwag
Dravid *
Lara
Kallis
Sangakkara +
Flintoff
Pollock
Kumble
Muralitharan
Akhtar
12: Collingwood
Not direct proof, but it can be considered 'Intent'. A good lawyer can make Shane Warne look like a regular drug takermarc71178 said:Well if you wouldn't take it to court, it's because you have no proof, so why do you say it on here?
A better lawyer could make it look like the sample was contaminated by a third party.Sehwag309 said:Not direct proof, but it can be considered 'Intent'. A good lawyer can make Shane Warne look like a regular drug taker
Thus only 1 year ban
A better lawyer will tuck tail and run at that idea as trying to prove BOTH samples were contaminated is an exercis in futility.A better lawyer could make it look like the sample was contaminated by a third party.
Thus he could then sue the ICC for defamation and slander against his good character.
C_C said:A better lawyer will tuck tail and run at that idea as trying to prove BOTH samples were contaminated is an exercis in futility.
Warne is a great leggie......but he is also a drug cheat. Its just as simple as that.
There is the proof Marc, a masking agent that is used to cover perfromance enhancing drugs. Whay else would the drug be bannedC_C said:ANYONE who takes a masking agent is implicitly guilty of taking performance enhancing drugs.
That is standard IAAF and IOC procedures.
Legally, you do not have to prove that a person has taken performance enhancing drugs to accuse them of doping. You have to be abole to prove that they took any of the banned drugs- performance enhancing or masking agent.
Shane Warne is guilty of taking banned drugs, ie, he is a drug cheat.
Shane Warne is guilty.
Simple as that.
He tested positive for hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride, drugs which are used for several things but primarily for weight loss by athletes.
Since weight loss leads to a direct increase in stamina, it *IS* a performance enhancing drug.
Sabotage! Hmm, weak caseScallywag said:A better lawyer could make it look like the sample was contaminated by a third party.
Thus he could then sue the ICC for defamation and slander against his good character.
I agree "phone ***" offenders should be locked up. Thats a pretty big crime with a hefty penalty and on a par with "spanking your monkey".Sehwag309 said:phone ***
AFAIK all a 12th man does is field...Sir Redman said:12th man Collingwood? I presume your only doing that to boost his ego...Collingwood would get nowhere near World XI selection if the selectors have any brains.
Yes all he was proven to take was a masking agent.chaminda_00 said:There is the proof Marc, a masking agent that is used to cover perfromance enhancing drugs.
So you think he just had a fondness for masking agents?marc71178 said:Yes all he was proven to take was a masking agent.
He has never been proven to take any performance enhancing drug.
Was wondering how many people would miss the point of the 12th man.Sir Redman said:12th man Collingwood? I presume your only doing that to boost his ego...Collingwood would get nowhere near World XI selection if the selectors have any brains.
I guess this is the one day squad? If your looking for the allrounder type I would far rather have Cairns and if you want a batsman I can think of many who would qualify ahead of Collingwood
Can you prove he took it to mask anything and not to help lose weight?garage flower said:So you think he just had a fondness for masking agents?
I was being a bit flippant and didn't study the case closely enough to make particularly informed comment.marc71178 said:Can you prove he took it to mask anything and not to help lose weight?