Following on from my last hypothetical about the Bradman like batsman who couldnt field at all.
Could a brilliant fielded make it to the top level if he couldnt really bat or bowl very well? Im talking about a player so good at fielding he would make the likes of Jonty Rhodes and Andrew Symonds look worse than Tuffnel. Able to stop everything, take every half chance, lightning quick across the field, tall, nimble - just brilliant in all aspects of fielding. The Bradman of fielding.
Now could he make it to the top level?
My opinion is not in test matches but perhaps in one day cricket.
Your thoughts?
Could a brilliant fielded make it to the top level if he couldnt really bat or bowl very well? Im talking about a player so good at fielding he would make the likes of Jonty Rhodes and Andrew Symonds look worse than Tuffnel. Able to stop everything, take every half chance, lightning quick across the field, tall, nimble - just brilliant in all aspects of fielding. The Bradman of fielding.
Now could he make it to the top level?
My opinion is not in test matches but perhaps in one day cricket.
Your thoughts?