Cricket Betting Site Betway
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Scotty Stryris' bowling

  1. #1
    U19 12th Man Lyell_Chris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    245

    Icon5 Scotty Stryris' bowling

    do you guys think scotty styris is under used as a bowler in test matches, as a very economical bowling I think he is very usefull when gilly and co are smashing the nz quicks around.
    50 cent is only half the dollar he could be
    MSN is warriors_fan@hotmail.com
    Manchester United, The All Blacks, The Black Caps and The Sydney Roosters All rock

    Deja Moo's avater gives me nightmares

  2. #2
    Cricketer Of The Year Arjun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    8,598
    Exactly. He's bowled a lot better in ODI's when he gets more then 8 overs, and since the NZ series, his bowling average has been in the 20's. Can't do worse than the likes of Chris Martin and Kyle Mills.
    "Talent is nothing without opportunity"
    "You're not remembered for aiming at the target, but hitting it"

    Twenty20 used to be boring.

    Sponsored...by...nothing!!!

  3. #3
    International Captain thierry henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    6,291
    It often amazes me that we are constantly rotating through bowlers like Mills, Franklin, Tuffey, Mason, Cairns, Martin, Oram, and a whole heap of others. To be fair, some of those guys are better bowlers than others, but I'm going somewhere with this. The prototypical NZ pace bowler is generally someone who bowls around 130k back of length and tries to be accurate and get a bit of bounce (Oram, Mason), or someone who who bowls around 130k and tries to swing it (Franklin, Mills). Most of them aren't even very accurate. It seems incredible that Styris, who bowls accurately at 130k and swings it a bit, is only regarded as a part time bowling option.

  4. #4
    Cricketer Of The Year Arjun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    8,598
    The prototypical NZ pace bowler is generally someone who bowls around 130k back of length and tries to be accurate and get a bit of bounce (Oram, Mason), or someone who who bowls around 130k and tries to swing it (Franklin, Mills). Most of them aren't even very accurate.
    Mixing with lots of 120-odds, or even a few over 140, depending on the bowler. They seem to lose their swing when they play on flat pitches, or pitches with lots of bounce, or without any.
    It seems incredible that Styris, who bowls accurately at 130k and swings it a bit, is only regarded as a part time bowling option.
    Not too long ago, someone said that he's had a few problems with his knees, but he seems to be a lot fitter.
    It often amazes me that we are constantly rotating through bowlers like Mills, Franklin, Tuffey, Mason, Cairns, Martin, Oram, and a whole heap of others.
    Cairns, Oram and Mills to a lesser extent offer more runs in the middle order, so there may be some point in playing them. Franklin is a decent swing bowler, but bowls way too slowly to be a consistent wicket-taker, but is a variation in the attack. Tuffey has just had one good series outside NZ, but seems slightly better than the rest. Mills bowls two bad balls an over, which is quite risky, and tends to no-ball a little too often. There was talk of getting Lance Hamilton in the side, though he's a little too old.


  5. #5
    Spanish_Vicente sledger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Elm, he do brood. And Oak, he do hate. But the Willow-man goes walking, If you stays out late.
    Posts
    47,452
    hmmmm styris's bowling can be quite handy IMO but i wouldnt say that it would be wise to make him a regular bowler, batsman would probably work him out rather easily and cart him about...... then again they might not.....its a tough one to call. From what i'v seen his bowling has been rather impressive i must say.

  6. #6
    Cricket Web Staff Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    2005
    Posts
    80,401
    Styris has never exactly been the most effective Test-bowler, has he?
    RD
    Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
    (Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
    chris.hinton: h
    FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006

  7. #7
    Cricket Web Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    27,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Arjun
    Exactly. He's bowled a lot better in ODI's when he gets more then 8 overs, and since the NZ series, his bowling average has been in the 20's. Can't do worse than the likes of Chris Martin and Kyle Mills.
    Cause, effect... He only gets more than 8 overs when he's bowling well. Utterly spurious point. That's like saying "Ponting averages very highly when he bats for more than two hours".
    MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
    CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
    ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

    Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

    Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog

  8. #8
    International Coach
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,718
    Handy, but nothing more from what I saw of him in the summer. Got a few useful wickets at the time, useful partenarship breaker IMO.
    Manchester United FC: 20 Times

    R.I.P. Sledger's Signature, 2004-2008

  9. #9
    International Captain thierry henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    6,291
    I don't think Styris is a particularly good bowler, don't get me wrong. My point is, what sets him apart from NEW ZEALAND'S specialist paceman?? He is pretty much the same pace as the likes of Franklin, Mills, Oram, Tuffey, and generally at least as accurate.

  10. #10
    U19 Vice-Captain
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Dorkland, New Zealand
    Posts
    556
    We need specialist test bowlers. Styris is a good ODI bowler and that's it, he's in the test team as a batsman.

  11. #11
    Hall of Fame Member Smudge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    There or thereabouts
    Posts
    17,791
    Quote Originally Posted by Macka
    We need specialist test bowlers. Styris is a good ODI bowler and that's it, he's in the test team as a batsman.
    And he's not even doing that very well at the moment...

  12. #12
    First Class Debutant cric_manic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    South of Heaven
    Posts
    831
    thats another argument......

  13. #13
    First Class Debutant cric_manic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    South of Heaven
    Posts
    831
    he his a odi bowler yes he can be handy in test matches but nothing more in the one day game he is a genuine option because he his a wicket-to-wicket bowler(bowles straight) in test matches that is none effective because of the longness of the game

    remember he started his carrear as a bowler batting well down the order at number 8 or 9 i think,has taken around 60 wickets and odi figuers of 6-25 some of the best odi figuers by a nz bowler but his test stats a less than emmpressive

  14. #14
    Cricketer Of The Year Arjun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    8,598
    Cause, effect... He only gets more than 8 overs when he's bowling well. Utterly spurious point. That's like saying "Ponting averages very highly when he bats for more than two hours".
    We need specialist test bowlers. Styris is a good ODI bowler and that's it, he's in the test team as a batsman.
    The likes of Martin, Mills, Franklin and a whole lot of specialist bowlers get their full 10 overs even when they're bowling utter rubbish. For what they bowl, the team already has Scott Styris. It makes such bowlers merely excess baggage in the team. If Styris bowls more often, they would have the place to play an extra batsman, and they need more runs. His position is optimised this way. They need specialist bowlers who are really special, not just more Styris clones without the batting skills.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. CW Players A-Z
    By Mr Mxyzptlk in forum CW Development League
    Replies: 316
    Last Post: 09-05-2007, 11:35 PM
  2. Batting vs Bowling
    By Neil Pickup in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 03-02-2005, 12:59 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-12-2004, 07:58 AM
  4. Watson close to bowling comeback: Lillee
    By Eclipse in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 11-01-2004, 05:23 AM
  5. Comparing Batting and Bowling performances
    By Mister Wright in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-12-2003, 06:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •