marc71178
Eyes not spreadsheets
Lehmann 30Josh said:Where's Lehmann & Clarke??
Clarke 35
Incidentally both are now below England's entire top 6.
Lehmann 30Josh said:Where's Lehmann & Clarke??
Why on Earth should someone be discredited for not playing?!?!?!SirBloody Idiot said:Surely, others have played better then a bloke not playing at all.
In terms of bowling, Lehmann is 68th, Clarke is 69th.Josh said:Where's Lehmann & Clarke??
It's not that the player is discredited, but rather that he shouldn't be credited. Thus other players who are credited for playing gain ground and ultimately surpass. In theory anyway.Richard said:Why on Earth should someone be discredited for not playing?!?!?!
It's not their fault they're not playing!
Hmm, AFAIK he had a 7for in Aus, another 6fer or something in PakFaaipDeOiad said:I believe Kumble has in fact gone up quite a bit. The thing that must be remembered is that Kumble doesn't have a brilliant test average over his whole career, and although he takes a lot of wickets per test that does have an impact. He has also never achieved the same results outside of India.
His average this year is significantly better than his career average, so he has gone up a number of places and is now quite high in the top 10, in fact he is the second highest rank spin bowler now, having overtaken Shane Warne. His results from prior to this season still have a bit of an impact however, so he isn't in the top 5.
Anil Kumble's home record:Sehwag309 said:Hmm, AFAIK he had a 7for in Aus, another 6fer or something in Pak
Also, I have been seeing him around 7-8 b4 Aus at home(or in between), he did take another 7for in that series too
FaaipDeOiad said:Anil Kumble's home record:
47 tests, 272 wickets @ 22.87, strike rate of 55.88 and economy rate of 2.46
A truly brilliant record by any standard.
Anil Kumble's away record:
45 tests, 172 wickets @ 35.76, strike rate of 80.32 and economy rate of 2.67.
Much, much poorer.
It's all to do with his career in total for someone like him - his recent form is far better than his earlier parts, but the earlier parts still have a bearing.Sehwag309 said:Well, congrats to Mcgrath but I keep wondering why hasn't kumble gone up
64 wickets outta the 74 v/s Pak/Aus/Rsa with 6 fers @24
Whats the calculation like?
He is still at 7 or 8 something
It ranks each attack as a whole to determine how good they are.Sehwag309 said:Hmm, wonder how they do it!
Jnr. said:Brett Lee is 35th.
Part time spinner Jayasuriya is 37th. Andy Blignaut is 34th.
What are you suggestingtooextracool said:jayasuriya is behind lee???
ahh, I dont think he is suggesting anything other than "lee" being such a short 3 letter name and "Jayasuriya" so longLink said:What are you suggesting
He's suggesting that Sanath Jayasuriya, the opening batsman for Sri Lanka and part-time left arm orthodox spinner is a better test bowler than Brett Lee, the Australian fast bowler who rains 150 kmh deliveries on his opponents.Link said:What are you suggesting