To be fair he has done in it both Sri Lanka and India this year.tooextracool said:amazing how 1 excellent series changes peoples opinion....
yes before which his head was being called for despite averaging over 40.Craig said:To be fair he has done in it both Sri Lanka and India this year.
Yet you could have said that about Stuart Matsikenyeri in the NWS had he not been surrounded by equals and the odd superior.Prince EWS said:I think its VERY obvious that Elton Chigumbura is Zimbabwe's best ODI batsman.
ive wsaid this a zillion times before, but taylor is not an opener, whether or not he opens for his domestic side is irrelevant given the quality of their attacks. he doesnt have the technique or the footwork to succeed as an opener. he should bat at either 4 or 5.Steulen said:Hmm...I disagree!
I said Taylor and I'm sticking to it. Mainly because Taylor is an opener and therefore comes in while Zimbabwe can still entertain thoughts of getting a result. By the time Chigumbura comes in, all hope is lost and he can just club away like there's no tomorrow.
That Taylor still makes innings of considerable size makes him the best batsman in the team currently, imVHo.
Yet he plays for Zimbabwe as an opener and opens the batting. He is an opener for Zimbabwe, so you can't discredit his point.tooextracool said:ive wsaid this a zillion times before, but taylor is not an opener, whether or not he opens for his domestic side is irrelevant given the quality of their attacks. he doesnt have the technique or the footwork to succeed as an opener. he should bat at either 4 or 5.
You may have an argument for Smith in Tests, but ODIs?!? He averages 37.64 with a SR of 74.19. That's a lower average than Kallis (45.99/71.12), Klusener (41.10/89.91 SR) and Rudolph (39.60/SR 71). Not to mention Dippenaar (42.21).The Baconator said:ODIs
South Africa: Smith
Zimbabwe: Taylor
yes i know he does open the batting in zimbabwe, i infact mentioned it in my post. but that doesnt change the fact that hes not going to suceed as an opener. which incidentally was the only point i was trying to make.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Yet he plays for Zimbabwe as an opener and opens the batting. He is an opener for Zimbabwe, so you can't discredit his point.
Interestingly enough he averages a wonderful 13.32 and has gotten past 10 in ODIs on 12 occasions in 33 attempts. He averages 4.21 when he doesn't get past 10 and is yet to register a 50.Richard said:Yet you could have said that about Stuart Matsikenyeri in the NWS had he not been surrounded by equals and the odd superior.
I firmly believe he is the best one-day batsman in their current ODI side. Taibu isn't too far behind. Chigumbura seems to me to have become just a little overrated of late.
And as posted above, the stats back up your point to date.tooextracool said:yes i know he does open the batting in zimbabwe, i infact mentioned it in my post. but that doesnt change the fact that hes not going to suceed as an opener. which incidentally was the only point i was trying to make.
Yeah, I know (well, I knew some of it), it's just my interpretation.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Interestingly enough he averages a wonderful 13.32 and has gotten past 10 in ODIs on 12 occasions in 33 attempts. He averages 4.21 when he doesn't get past 10 and is yet to register a 50.
That's Zimbabwe's best ODI batsman? Heck, at least Sibanda has a couple of 50s! (in less innings mind you - worse average though)
Meanwhile Taibu has a solid 30.46 average in his last 15 ODIs with 2 of his 5 50s and a top score of 96*.
Richard said:He's played a huge part in one of Zimbabawe's few victories since WC2003, though.