• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Your International team rankings (1-7)

odyssey

Cricket Spectator
Your International team rankings (1-8)

Just wondering how everyone views Int'l (starting 11) teams
Ranked 1-7... At the moment. score out of 100.
* test & ODI combined.
teams excl; zim & bang.
Mine:
Aus 94/100
Eng 79/100
S.L 73/100
SAF 72/100
NZ 71/100
WI 71/100
Ind 70/100
Pak 69/100
:p

Your teams............. 8-)
 
Last edited:

masterblaster

International Captain
The CW Rankings are the ultimate for me. Bazza and Neil have done a great job with ODI's and Test's respectively.

CW = Home of the best rankings on the Internet, PERIOD!

:p
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
masterblaster said:
The CW Rankings are the ultimate for me. Bazza and Neil have done a great job with ODI's and Test's respectively.

CW = Home of the best rankings on the Internet, PERIOD!

:p
DITTO
 

odyssey

Cricket Spectator
Yea i checked that out....hard to follow.
Anyway i just thought i'd start a thread where everyone can have there opinions on how they rank teams 1-8 out of 100....much simpler IMO.
 
Last edited:

Buddhmaster

International Captain
May as well do it.

Australia-95/100
England-70/100
Sri Lanka-65/100
India-60/100
Sth Africa-60/100
Pakistan-58/100
New Zealand-50/100

All **** right now besides aussies.
 

odyssey

Cricket Spectator
I came up with those numbers just from my opinion. nothing official....
What's yours?
 
Last edited:

The Baconator

International Vice-Captain
Australia 95/100
England 81/100
SAF 77/100
India 73/100
SL 73/100
New Zealand 71/100
Pakistan 68/100
West Indies 58/100
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
1. Australia
2. NewZealand
3. England
4. India
5. Pakistan
6. Sri Lanka
7. West Indies
8. South Africa
9. Kenya
10. Zimbabwe
11. Bangladesh
 

odyssey

Cricket Spectator
I disagree i think SLankans r good.. they've got:
Jayasuriya
Jayawardene
Sangakarra
Murali
Attapattu
Vaas
all world class + other useful players.
 

Craig

World Traveller
Vaas is inconsistent, I don't really rate Atapattu that highly because he is an all-or-nothing player, Sangakarra is a fine player, Jayasuriya is past it IMO, Jayawardene hasn't convinced me of his class outside of his own backyard.

Really sangakarra and Murali you can say that are world-class.

Anyway it doesn't matter how many world class players you have got, if your inconsistent and don't preform as a team, that doesn't mean much IMO.

Just look at the Dutch football team.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
I'd say calling all those players World Class gives a very loose definition to the term World Class.
 

tooextracool

International Coach
marc71178 said:
NZ ahead of England bemuses me.
its test and ODIs combined. other than that one bad series in england, NZ havent done all that badly in tests, and they've certainly been a cut above england in ODIs.
 

Mr Mxyzptlk

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Craig said:
Jayasuriya is past it IMO
Is that how he's managed 4 centuries (including a double) in his last 17 Test innings among a total of 1090 runs @ 60.55? Not to mention 254 runs in 4 innings against the Aussies.
 

Top