• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Leadership of Indian cricket

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
honestbharani said:
He will tone it down, I am sure. But I was just referring to the general idea that wicket keepers make very good vice captains, but yes, asking a keeper to be the captain doesn't seem the best idea.
Yes they should since they have the best view of whats happening. Of course they have to be good students of the game too.
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
This is a funny thread. :) Karthik(Dinesh), Pathan, Kaif, Harbhajan, Sehwag, Laxman and Tendulkar for captaincy. :laugh::laugh:

IMO, If Gangs is fired only Dravid or Kumble can take his position.
 

SquidAU

First Class Debutant
As if the BCCI will "demote" Ganguly because of a series loss at home. He is the "winningest" captain in Indian cricket.

IMO, Dravid would have to be next in line...
 

tooextracool

International Coach
yes because ganguly with his brilliant average of under 20, turned the series upside down and inside out didnt he?
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I don't think it was Sourav's captaincy which cost India the series. Plus he played one good knock, got ran out by his partner in another and 'walked' in the third.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Sanz said:
Oh He didn't lose the series, It was Dravid. :)
Nah mate, the whole team did.

And regarding Kaif, he's obviously not a short-term solution to the captaincy. But if/when Ganguly does give up captaincy or retires or whatever, I think Dravid should take it with Kaif promoted to vice captain to prepare for what will eventually (IMO) occur, Kaif being promoted to captain. I don't see Sehwag or Yuvraj leading, and though Pathan is an option, I think Kaif is the man for the job. This is long term as I said.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Sorry, I just do not see Dravid as a good captain. He is too soft, definitely. I can't see him going up to so-and-so and tell them that they have to score runs in this match or else they will be dropped. I don't think he defends his players as well as Sourav either. At times, during interviews as captain, he just looks lost. Trust me, he lives in my city, I love his batting and his value to the side and his attitude to the game, but captaincy, no, I do think that Laxman or even Kumble would be a better option.
 

garage flower

State Vice-Captain
marc71178 said:
Possibly, possibly not - but whilst still skipper, definitely IMO.
But that's the entire point Marc, that others also seem to have missed. Is Ganguly worth his place as a batsman and, if not, is there a suitable alternative captain or would it be worth weakening the batting to retain Ganguly for his captaincy skills?

This will be a big issue if Ganguly fails against South Africa.
 

Arjun

Cricketer Of The Year
Tendulkar- He was made captain at the wrong time, and he was not given a fair try. This was the quote of Sir Garfield Sobers, who has been part of a great team, and a great player himself. However, having a great player helps the team a lot, as was the case with Sanath, Akram and Lara. It still depends on form- if he's in form, the team plays well.

Ganguly- He is described as an aggressive leader, who defends his players, and sticks to his decisions. However, if the team lacks great players, it backfires once too often. He does not adjust to changing situations, even when the pitches don't suit his team and his players don't perform. He is not the best strategist either, and very predictable. That is why the Indian team under him has not won too many tounraments. For FOUR years.

Dravid- many mistake him for being too soft, and not aggressive enough, but that is just an image. He is a very clever captain, which not too many notice. In a match where there were few overs left, and quick runs were needed, Dravid sat out and promoted the fast-scoring Yuvraj and Agarkar ahgead of himself, and it worked. He brought on spinners a lot earlier in ODI's and the ball got a little too slow for the openers. His innovative, out-of-the-box thinking is his main strength. As for his batting form, he is a world-clas player, and one of the best batsmen of this era, and this should not affect his batting. After all, it is a matter of just a few matches. Comlpaints were made about Vaughan's captaincy and its effect on his batting, and he silenced his critics this year. Dravid is a far better player than Vaughan.

Laxman- He has the best cricketing intelligence and sticks to what's best for that situation, in the match. Reputed journalists and experts tip him as a future captain, because of this. He has done well as a captain of his state side, so he has experience. There may be some asking if he is a certainty in the side- he is a better player than the Indian team's regular captain.

Kumble- The Indian team, as a bowling unit, will benefit. He sets attacking fields, and does not give away easy runs. A hard trier on the field, he can be effective as a captain, when given a chance. He should not be branded 'less than a certainty'- he is the team's strike bowler.

Sehwag- An aggressive player will make a good captain, but only when in form. He too think out of the box, and the character that he is, he does not mind taking the attack to the opposition. He has not been given many chances at captaining the Indian side, and must turn out for the rest of the domestic season as Delhi's captain..

Kaif, Harbhajan- These two are not certainties, and are too hot-tempered.

Pathan, Karthik- These are rank outsiders.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
garage flower said:
But that's the entire point Marc, that others also seem to have missed. Is Ganguly worth his place as a batsman and, if not, is there a suitable alternative captain or would it be worth weakening the batting to retain Ganguly for his captaincy skills?
Well, looking at some of the younger ones coming in, they've not done a great deal to say it is weakening the batting by retaining him, but IMO he is exactly the captain India need!
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
tooextracool said:
yes because ganguly with his brilliant average of under 20, turned the series upside down and inside out didnt he?
TEC, What was the average of Mike Brearly as Captain ? (Ganguly is no Mike Brearly ofcourse). Fact is that Ganguly cant be fired for the loss of this series because he was captain in only 2 of the tests.

Since you are talking about averages, what was Dravid's average again ? IMO someone named Irfan Pathan and AAgarkar had better average than him. :-O
 
Last edited:

garage flower

State Vice-Captain
marc71178 said:
Well, looking at some of the younger ones coming in, they've not done a great deal to say it is weakening the batting by retaining him, but IMO he is exactly the captain India need!
Fair enough, I'd probably agree. Yuvraj and Kaif have knocked on the door, but probably need to smash it to smithereens to put real pressure on Ganguly.

Still, with Tendy, Dravid and Laxman (I can't believe people have questioned his place on other threads) likely to hold down 3 spots in perpetuity, potential specialist middle-order bats only have 1 realistic target.

Though Ganguly's spirit and feistyness seem to have imbued India with a little more fire and belief in recent years, I'm not sure he's tactically astute enough, should his batting decline, to justify inclusion as a Brearley-esque specialist captain.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Arjun said:
Tendulkar- He was made captain at the wrong time, and he was not given a fair try. This was the quote of Sir Garfield Sobers, who has been part of a great team, and a great player himself. However, having a great player helps the team a lot, as was the case with Sanath, Akram and Lara. It still depends on form- if he's in form, the team plays well.

Ganguly- He is described as an aggressive leader, who defends his players, and sticks to his decisions. However, if the team lacks great players, it backfires once too often. He does not adjust to changing situations, even when the pitches don't suit his team and his players don't perform. He is not the best strategist either, and very predictable. That is why the Indian team under him has not won too many tounraments. For FOUR years.

Dravid- many mistake him for being too soft, and not aggressive enough, but that is just an image. He is a very clever captain, which not too many notice. In a match where there were few overs left, and quick runs were needed, Dravid sat out and promoted the fast-scoring Yuvraj and Agarkar ahgead of himself, and it worked. He brought on spinners a lot earlier in ODI's and the ball got a little too slow for the openers. His innovative, out-of-the-box thinking is his main strength. As for his batting form, he is a world-clas player, and one of the best batsmen of this era, and this should not affect his batting. After all, it is a matter of just a few matches. Comlpaints were made about Vaughan's captaincy and its effect on his batting, and he silenced his critics this year. Dravid is a far better player than Vaughan.

Laxman- He has the best cricketing intelligence and sticks to what's best for that situation, in the match. Reputed journalists and experts tip him as a future captain, because of this. He has done well as a captain of his state side, so he has experience. There may be some asking if he is a certainty in the side- he is a better player than the Indian team's regular captain.

Kumble- The Indian team, as a bowling unit, will benefit. He sets attacking fields, and does not give away easy runs. A hard trier on the field, he can be effective as a captain, when given a chance. He should not be branded 'less than a certainty'- he is the team's strike bowler.

Sehwag- An aggressive player will make a good captain, but only when in form. He too think out of the box, and the character that he is, he does not mind taking the attack to the opposition. He has not been given many chances at captaining the Indian side, and must turn out for the rest of the domestic season as Delhi's captain..

Kaif, Harbhajan- These two are not certainties, and are too hot-tempered.

Pathan, Karthik- These are rank outsiders.
Inshort you are offering three choices ...
Sachin
OR Tendulkar
OR Sachin Tendulkar..
right ??
 

Top