An in-form Yuvraj and Sehwag- when out of form, they're terrible. Tendulkar is not so much fun to watch, but still bankable. Same with Fleming. Ganguly is no fun to watch these days- he's getting to be really scratchy, just like Nasser Hussain, and his fielding and running between wickets are awful. Dravid is definitely worth a watch when he's aggressive- he can make all Sehwag look pedestrian.Dasa said:
then im afraid you know nothing about ODI cricket......SJS said:
tendulkar is no fun to watch.....while yuvraj is?Arjun said:
gilchrist certainly has been far more impressive in tests than he has in ODIs. if you ask me, jayasuriya is far more destructive than gilly in ODIs. it must be said that gilly is very much an overrated ODI player.Eclipse said:
dammit, how many times must it be said? he has to do it against australia!!Neil Pickup said:
yes i know, and obviously he is one of the top 3 players in ODI cricket, but for someone to suggest that both richards and tendulkar are not just better, but better by a considerable distance than bevan is just plain ridiculous.marc71178 said:
yes he played in a different era, and he still averaged considerably less than bevan. there are arguments that suggest he might be just as good, there isnt one that shows that he was better, and there certainly isnt any that shows that there is daylight between him and bevan.marc71178 said:
