Batting Height at the Crease

Jonesy · 26-09-2009, 03:23 AM

Hi, I'm a lower order batsman/tailender - but I like to think that I can be handy with the bat and take it pretty seriously. My coach (outside the club) has always taught me to stay low at the crease, bending the back, but still leaning forward. The other day at the nets the captain of one of the XIs approached me and said that he reckons it's the opposite of what I should be doing - standing up so I can have a bigger stride forward. I admit that my stride is pretty small, but I've been taught that if you get your head in position then your foot position is not the be-all-end-all and it's given me some pretty good results.

Just wondering, is either of the two technically correct or is it a matter of personal opinion/feel?

Thanks.

knights12 · 05-10-2009, 04:02 AM

I would say its a mixture of both really. I agree that you should concentrate on getting your head to the ball because your foot will naturally follow, but in terms of being "low" I would disagree with that. I think you just need to be in a natural position over the ball, if you can hit the ball below your eyes then you are probably in a good position.

vic_orthdox · 05-10-2009, 04:22 AM

Getting low and crouching makes it more likely that you'll fall over at the crease; your head will be outside the line of your body and the ball.

By standing up tall, it helps keep your eyes level as well.

26-09-2009, 03:23 AM	#1 (permalink)
Jonesy Cricket Spectator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Melbourne Posts: 7	Batting Height at the Crease Hi, I'm a lower order batsman/tailender - but I like to think that I can be handy with the bat and take it pretty seriously. My coach (outside the club) has always taught me to stay low at the crease, bending the back, but still leaning forward. The other day at the nets the captain of one of the XIs approached me and said that he reckons it's the opposite of what I should be doing - standing up so I can have a bigger stride forward. I admit that my stride is pretty small, but I've been taught that if you get your head in position then your foot position is not the be-all-end-all and it's given me some pretty good results. Just wondering, is either of the two technically correct or is it a matter of personal opinion/feel? Thanks.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Archived [19/01/09] Battrick	Jamee999	Battrick	8769	17-01-2009 07:05 PM
Where should i improve	ash chaulk	Battrick	408	05-06-2008 05:59 AM
Archived [10/08/07] Battrick	PY	Battrick	8536	10-08-2007 01:59 AM
my team	bugssy	Battrick	68	18-04-2007 06:00 AM
Official Club Cricket (8-9)	Mr Mxyzptlk	CW Offseason Club Cricket	742	08-09-2005 07:38 AM

05-10-2009, 04:02 AM	#2 (permalink)
knights12 Cricket Spectator Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: New Zealand Posts: 42	I would say its a mixture of both really. I agree that you should concentrate on getting your head to the ball because your foot will naturally follow, but in terms of being "low" I would disagree with that. I think you just need to be in a natural position over the ball, if you can hit the ball below your eyes then you are probably in a good position.

05-10-2009, 04:22 AM	#3 (permalink)
vic_orthdox Global Moderator Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 24,365	Getting low and crouching makes it more likely that you'll fall over at the crease; your head will be outside the line of your body and the ball. By standing up tall, it helps keep your eyes level as well.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)