Cricket Player Manager
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: England Team Discussion

  1. #1
    Cricketer Of The Year Cabinet96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    9,990

    England Team Discussion

    Cricinfo have just announced that KP will miss the whole tournament after another setback on his knee injury.

    In a way, this solves what would've been a pretty tricky selection dilemma, as all the batters from the NZ series could argue that they deserved to be in the strongest XI for the first game.

    For me, the side pretty much picks itself now with KP out.

    1. Cook*
    2. Bell
    3. Trott
    4. Root
    5. Morgan
    6. Buttler +
    7. Bresnan
    8. Broad
    9. Swann
    10. Finn
    11. Anderson

    12. Patel
    13. Tredwell
    14. Woakes
    15. Bairstow/Kieswetter

    Woakes can come in for any of the seamers if there is a fitness issue, and will probably be competing with Bresnan for the number 7 spot, after going OK in NZ. I'm personally a big fan of picking five specialist bowlers, trying to restrict the opposition as much as possible, then using quality batsman to get the runs. In England with two new balls in use I think it's the best method. Given it worked well for England last summer, I see no reason to change method.

    Others might have different players and team set ups in mind though. Discuss.
    Last edited by Cabinet96; 24-04-2013 at 11:59 AM.

  2. #2
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    44,050
    Completely agree with all of that, especially your opinion on team balance. It's definitely the way to go for ODIs in England, particularly if you have the players to do it - back your top six to chase/set 250-275 batting properly and back a proper full bowling lineup to defend/restrict the opposition to that total with two new balls in English conditions.

    It's why England have become so hard to beat at home in ODIs; ODIs in England resemble Test cricket more than anywhere else in the world due to the conditions.
    ~ Cribbertarian ~

    Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09

    Quote Originally Posted by John Singleton
    Recognition of Property Rights in material objects is the recognition of a manís right to exist; his right to pursue his own goals in his own manner at his own discretion with what is rightfully his to command. Just as the Right to Life is the right to the property of oneís own person, so the right to own material products is the right to sustain oneís life and to keep the results of oneís own efforts.


  3. #3
    Cricketer Of The Year Cabinet96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    9,990
    Yeah, if you have a decent attack it also means you don't need to score big runs, so can therefore stack your batting line up with test class batsman, and less hit or miss big hitters. England were the only test playing nation to not make 300 in an ODI in 2012, but they also had a record of played 14, won 12.

  4. #4
    State Vice-Captain BackFootPunch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,129
    Will Swann be back in time for the Champions Trophy?


  5. #5
    Request Your Custom Title Now! benchmark00's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Is this CricketWeb's greatest poster in the short history of the forum?
    Posts
    37,157
    Not sure about this lack of three openers with two new balls though......
    Parmi | #1 draft pick | Jake King is **** | Big Bash League tipping champion of the universe
    Come and Paint Turtle
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    Kohli. Do something in test cricket for once please.

    Thanks.

  6. #6
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    44,050
    Quote Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
    Not sure about this lack of three openers with two new balls though......
    They've put the third one at four.

  7. #7
    International Coach flibbertyjibber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mrs Miggins pie shop
    Posts
    11,931
    Agree with that squad but maybe wouldn't have Patel as 3 spinners in the squad in England is a bit much. Perhaps Luke Wright instead or maybe Ben Stokes.

  8. #8
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    44,050
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    Agree with that squad but maybe wouldn't have Patel as 3 spinners in the squad in England is a bit much. Perhaps Luke Wright instead or maybe Ben Stokes.
    I think it's the right call. Patel isn't really there as a spinner; he's there as a backup middle order bat and alternative balance option. He's actually been quite good with the bat of late in limited overs cricket for England when he's got a game. Tredwell is just there in case Swann gets injured.

  9. #9
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    #banblocky
    Posts
    20,368
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    Agree with that squad but maybe wouldn't have Patel as 3 spinners in the squad in England is a bit much. Perhaps Luke Wright instead or maybe Ben Stokes.
    I really wish people would stop regarding Samit Patel as a spinner.

  10. #10
    Cricketer Of The Year Cabinet96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    9,990
    I don't really think there are many better alternatives with the bat in limited overs cricket for England. If Pietersen was fit he would be in the squad in Patel's place, but he's not. Maybe in the future Stokes could get in, but I think it's a bit early for that now.
    Last edited by Cabinet96; 26-04-2013 at 06:20 AM.

  11. #11
    International Coach flibbertyjibber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mrs Miggins pie shop
    Posts
    11,931
    I was thinking more along the lines of a bat who is a part time pace bowler rather than a bat who is a part time spinner. Think there isn't a lot between Patel and Wright with Stokes the young pretender. Be the same for the World Cup down under too, think the fact the balls are both new all the way through negates the spin options a bit.

  12. #12
    Hall of Fame Member grecian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Concentrating on the League
    Posts
    15,731
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    I was thinking more along the lines of a bat who is a part time pace bowler rather than a bat who is a part time spinner. Think there isn't a lot between Patel and Wright with Stokes the young pretender. Be the same for the World Cup down under too, think the fact the balls are both new all the way through negates the spin options a bit.
    Patel has really hit at a decent run-rate coming down the order foe England recently, it is often a part of the game England fail at miserably.
    Do I contradict myself?
    Very well then I contradict myself,
    (I am large, I contain multitudes.
    Walt Whitman

  13. #13
    International Debutant theegyptian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,052
    Ravi!

  14. #14
    International Debutant theegyptian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,052
    I'm not sure the selectors have taken any of the last 12 months into account. His batting form from an already low standard has fallen off the edge of the cliff.

    His bowling is tidy enough and will probably be decent in England in June but what you gonna bat him at 7?

    It's just awful that we've got no-one better.

  15. #15
    International Coach Pothas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Surbiton, UK
    Posts
    11,991
    Yeah love it, just for the reaction we are going to get.

    It is both a reasonable selection, in that he did well in the first bit of last summer, and a totally unjustifiable one, in that he has done nothing whatsoever to deserve being brought back.

    He better not actually make the side though.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Ban Discussion
    By uvelocity in forum Site Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-04-2012, 08:52 AM
  2. Brad Hodge Discussion Thread
    By vic_orthdox in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 15-12-2010, 06:44 AM
  3. CricSim/PlanetCricket Discussion etc
    By ripper868 in forum Testing Forum
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 17-08-2010, 07:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •