Please tell me that's a GFI.
A True Champion - Bob. Rest in peace. 15/04/06
"People today have too big a devil and too small a God"
- Stephen Currie
"The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?" Psalm 27:1
Yeah, it's my third GFI this season. Seems to improve ratings a lot more than it used to for some reason.
First GFI of the season, fairly sure it's my best.
15 * 3 + 10 * 4 + 3 * 4 + 11 * 3 + 11 * 2 + 5
Top Order: sensational
Middle Order: superb
Lower Order: woeful
Seam Bowling: quality
Spin Bowling: quality
A follower of the schools of Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett and Benaud
Member of ESAS, JMAS, DMAS, FRAS and RTDAS
when you're winning, you have friends
scores and dozens, real friends
when you're winning, never lonely
when you keep winning
My ratings on GFI.
Respectable (3*7) - 21
Mediocre (4*5) - 20
Abysmal (4*2) - 8
Competent (4*6) - 24
Mediocre (1*5) - 5
Feeble (1*4) - 4
That's a total of 82. Not too bad considering I've been playing less than two full seasons.
My best team on GFI would something like this
Respectable (if Cherry is fully fit)
Any guru know how many pionts that gets
you should not have bothered trying to read this...
Last edited by Robertinho; 21-12-2007 at 05:06 PM.
Yeah, I think I counted exquisite as 17 instead of 16.
"Under the spreading chestnut tree,
I sold you and you sold me."
Tempted to put Warnock-Kealey-Snodin-Aldred at 3-7 just to get a better rating
RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990 - 15/4/2006
Wouldn't really make a difference, the middle order rating counts for more than the top order but that's because it's more difficult to get a good middle order rating. My batstats ratings were higher when I put my best batsmen in the top order.
Yeah, of course the multiplier accounts for the number of batsmen, but ratings always seem to be more flattering with a stronger middle order. Don't ask me why, but just as an example.
PAN (stacking top order):
masterful top order
mediocre middle order
PAN (stacking middle order)
competent top order
exceptional middle order
And then on GFI...
GFI (Gray & Bhutia top, Mcmillan middle)
exceptional top order
strong middle order
GFI (Gray top order, Bhutia & Mcmillan middle order)
quality top order
remarkable middle order
Sure, you could simply say it was coincidence that I had high masterful/mediocre or low quality/remarkable.. but I think you'll find there's something much more sinister at work here
I'll GFI the last game of the season against a bot just to get mine.
Batstats rating = (Top Order x 3) + (Middle Order x 4) + (Lower Order x 4) + (Seam Bowling x # of seamers) + (Spin Bowling x # of spinners) + (Fielding).
Top Order: Strong
Middle Order: Strong
Lower Order: woeful
Seam Bowling: remarkable
Spin Bowling: respectable
9 * 3 = 27
9 * 4 = 36
3 * 4 = 12
12 * 3 = 36
7 * 2 = 14
4 * 1 = 4
TOTAL = 129
Member of the AAAS
Member of CW Green | Stedingham Jets Grade Cricket Team | Northside Power
Manager of South Australia (WCC)
Winner of AFL Tipping 2006 | Winner of Wimbeldon Prediction 2006
FFS, this stupid inability to edit after a day or two thing has kicked in. Most pointless thing ever.
CW Batstats Rankings
1. Asterix XI (225)
2. Anchormen (164)
3. Magical Ponies (160)
4. Whenuapai CC (159)
5. Dynamo Morpork (157)
6. Jaffna Jets (149)
7. Four Pillars and Poor Fillers (140)
8. Boggles (137)
9. Jamee 999ers (135)
10. Alternative XI (129)
11. Central Districts (123)
12. Opening Balance (120)
13. Tawonga Tigers (113)
14. Brackenhurst (102)
15. Tamil Eelam CC (86)
16. The Heath CC (82)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)