Archived [10/08/07] Battrick

[GotSpin]

I dont see how it's my fault though

 

[Scaly piscine]

End of Over 23: 126-0, runrate=5.48, reqrunrate=0.04 (126-10)
Mccaw 5-1-19-0
Nile* 43 (62 balls)
Packer 78 (77 balls)

Got the single needed off the next ball, easy win as expected - wanted bat first to at least have the game last a bit. Lisbie took 4-14, Pace 3 wickets, Dillon 2, Cahalane 1.

 

[Robertinho]

**** it im going to bed

Someone's a grumpy guts.

He has a point though, your bowling is **** Hing.

 

[GotSpin]

Someone's a grumpy guts.

He has a point though, your bowling is **** Hing.

And how am i supposed to fix that?

 

[Robertinho]

And how am i supposed to fix that?

Who do you think I am? Take your whining elsewhere.

 

[GotSpin]

Who do you think I am? Take your whining elsewhere.

Im not whining though

 

[andyc]

I dont see how it's my fault though

Well, it's hardly anyone else's fault. But hey, every team has their strengths and weaknesses. It's just yours are much more pronounced.

 

[Scaly piscine]

Emmen CC v Scaly Piscine CC (608713)  

Date: 20/10/2006 Ground: Emmen CG 
Pitch: Cracked  Weather: Sunny 
 
Emmen CC won the toss and elected to bat. 
First Innings of: Emmen CC  
Name                           Runs Balls 4s 6s 
 Tierney     c. Appleby b. Lisbie   41 65 2 1 
 Mcinerney              b. Pace      7  8 0 1 
 Hayden      c. Appleby b. Pace     16 16 0 0 
 Sheepy    c. Armstrong b. Cahalane 12 12 2 0 
 Whiteside    c. Lisbie b. Dillon    0  1 0 0 
 East (+)       c. Pace b. Dillon    3  8 0 0 
 Bernard           not  out         32 33 3 1 
 Mccaw        c. Barton b. Lisbie    0  1 0 0 
 Mudd  lbw              b. Pace      2  3 0 0 
 Bridges m (*)          b. Lisbie    1  7 0 0 
 Burgess          c. &  b. Lisbie    6  9 0 1 
Extras (0b, 4lb, 1w, 1nb)            6  
Total (27.0 overs, 10 wickets)     126  
 
FOW         1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9   10 
Total      19 39 66 67 76 94 94 99 106 126 
Batsman Out 2  3  4  5  6  1  8  9  10  11 
 
Name     O M  R W nb wd 
Horne    5 0 26 0 0 1 
Pace     8 0 44 3 0 0 
Cahalane 5 0 27 1 1 0 
Dillon   5 1 11 2 0 0 
Lisbie   4 1 14 4 0 0 

First Innings of: Scaly Piscine CC (take it easy)  
Name                           Runs Balls 4s 6s 
 Nile              not  out         44 63 0 2 
 Packer            not  out         78 77 8 0 
 Armstrong (+)       
 Dillon        
 Lisbie        
 Obrien        
 Appleby        
 Barton        
 Horne        
 Pace (*)       
 Cahalane        
Extras (0b, 4lb, 0w, 1nb)            5  
Total (23.1 overs, 0 wickets)      127  
 
FOW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Total           
Batsman Out           
 
Name      O M  R W nb wd 
Burgess   7 0 33 0 1 0 
Bridges m 5 0 25 0 0 0 
Mudd      5 0 40 0 0 0 
Mccaw     5 1 19 0 0 0 
Bernard 1.1 0  6 0 0 0 




[B]Reporter's Summary[/B] 
               Emmen CC [B]Scaly Piscine CC [/B]
Top Order:    competent [B]strong[/B] 
Middle Order: competent [B]respectable[/B] 
Lower Order:    abysmal [B]woeful[/B] 
Seam Bowling:  mediocre [B]respectable[/B] 
Spin Bowling:    feeble [B]proficient[/B] 
Fielding:      mediocre [B]mediocre[/B] 
 
MOTM: Packer

Middle order has gone up a level from previous games, looks like TIE/PAN/GIF barely makes any difference now.

 

[GotSpin]

Well, it's hardly anyone else's fault. But hey, every team has their strengths and weaknesses. It's just yours are much more pronounced.

Fair enough

 

[Adamc]

Scaly, how'd you get the scorecard to format correctly? I've tried a few times and can't seem to get it to work.

 

[Jungle Jumbo]

Another easy win, closing in on automatic promotion

Zebras 289-1 (50)
M Bhutia 59, R Chanderpaul 123*, N Ahmed 77*
Jalandhar CC 142 all out (28.3)
F Lal 2-19, M Ali 3-24, D Flint 3-31
Zebras won by 147 runs

 

[Agent TBY]

Is it just me or are the promotion tables in India for Level III a bit warped?

 

[Adamc]

Playing TIE today against the current 7th-placed team. They're decent enough though, got a couple of 100,000 BTR guns (including a 197k BTR bowler) but not much after that. Should be able to win as long as my batsmen don't collapse in a heap. They've only got one really good batsman so should be able to get through their lineup.

 

[Scaly piscine]

Scaly, how'd you get the scorecard to format correctly? I've tried a few times and can't seem to get it to work.

Copy it into a notepad file and alter it there as notepads use fixed width font. Make sure you add in the weather, space out the longest stuff first (like on mine I made sure Sheepy c. Armstrong b. Cahalane fitted in first) just space the rest out accordingly, done in a couple of minutes.

 

[Adamc]

Copy it into a notepad file and alter it there as notepads use fixed width font. Make sure you add in the weather, space out the longest stuff first (like on mine I made sure Sheepy c. Armstrong b. Cahalane fitted in first) just space the rest out accordingly, done in a couple of minutes.

OK thanks, will try it later.

Bowling first, Watkins just got their gun batsman out for 3. Should be able to keep them under 200 I think.

 

[Mahindinho]

Phew! Won, albeit with a bit of a collapse.

Reed (remarkable/quality bat) has really hit a poor run of form, not having hit a fifty for at least three matches. I think. Sandwith (remarkable/remarkable) hasn't been much better

 

[Scaly piscine]

OK thanks, will try it later.

Bowling first, Watkins just got their gun batsman out for 3. Should be able to keep them under 200 I think.

Hmm 4 consecutive maidens, still only one down tho - 73-1 off 22. Whitehorne bowling any death overs?

 

[Adamc]

Hmm 4 consecutive maidens, still only one down tho - 73-1 off 22. Whitehorne bowling any death overs?

Yep, five of them. Should be a pretty dramatic collapse if these two stay in till then.

 

[Scaly piscine]

Yep, five of them. Should be a pretty dramatic collapse if these two stay in till then.

9 for 53 to be 191ao, standard Battrick stuff.

 

[Jamee999]

Coasted to victory on TIE as usual.

Next week - Live coverage of Bardle's shot at a 10-fer.