Secondaries - Page 2

marc71178 · 21-07-2006, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieDominance

i think the minimum stamina and concentration/consistency in first class cricket will be competent who agrees

How do you mean?

Will every player who plays FC be automatically upgraded to competent secondaries?

AussieDominance · 21-07-2006, 07:10 PM

no i mean that if you are to be successful you need at least competent cons/conc for everyone

Adamc · 21-07-2006, 08:14 PM

Rubbish.

AussieDominance · 21-07-2006, 08:37 PM

why?

andyc · 21-07-2006, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieDominance

why?

Well, for one, it depends what division you're in. If you're in Div 5, feeble would probably be a decent starting point for a team, while in Div 1, a player with competent secondaries may find himself getting out for about 50, or copping a bit of stick. And, it depends what kind of player he is.. if he's a number 6 or 7 batsman, he doesn't really require his concentration to be super high. And, also, a player with less-than standard secondaries can still perform well, he just may, like I said, hit a 50 or so and get out, or a bowler may end up taking something like 3/50 off 10 overs-- they get carted around a bit, but still take wickets

AussieDominance · 21-07-2006, 09:16 PM

yeh i guess those are valid points but to be very successful you will have to have competent

Cloete · 21-07-2006, 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieDominance

yeh i guess those are valid points but to be very successful you will have to have competent

ffs...

Just keep ignoring everything said...

Don't worry, I'm sure if you have competent you will 100% absolutely be VERY successful! No doubt! Because you've reached the hallowed minimum!!

Robertinho · 22-07-2006, 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieDominance

yeh i guess those are valid points but to be very successful you will have to have competent

What? So you think the difference between being successful and very successful is something as simple as having competent secondaries?...

marc71178 · 22-07-2006, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AussieDominance

yeh i guess those are valid points but to be very successful you will have to have competent

Did you not read what Adam just said?

andyc · 22-07-2006, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marc71178

Did you not read what Adam just said?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adamc

Rubbish.

?
(

)

Adamc · 22-07-2006, 03:24 AM

Haha. I can't really be bothered explaining why it's a rubbish theory, it just is. Maybe for an individual player to be highly successful they will need a competent+ secondary, but as far as teams go there's no need to have everyone at that level to be successful.

marc71178 · 22-07-2006, 03:38 AM

I'm certainly hoping that's not the case, because I thought I had a team with fairly good secondaries, yet mine aren't close to the "golden position"

Scaly piscine · 22-07-2006, 04:13 AM

I hope med-med type batsmen can do okayish... I'll have at least 4 of that sort of skill, some of them bowlers.

superkingdave · 22-07-2006, 04:25 AM

indeed my two main batsmen are comp/superb and feeble/mediocre (stamina/conc),

Robertinho · 22-07-2006, 04:37 AM

I have a proficient/resp batsman who does rubbish against IV attacks... go figure.

22-07-2006, 04:13 AM	#28 (permalink)
Scaly piscine Hall of Fame Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: North East England Posts: 18,529	I hope med-med type batsmen can do okayish... I'll have at least 4 of that sort of skill, some of them bowlers. __________________ National Scrabble Champion 2009, 8th in 2009 World Championships, gold medal (team) at Causeway, 2011 Masters Champion 24 Hour Scrabble World Record Attempt for Charity, in aid of Daisy Chain and End Polio Now Countdown Series 57 Champion King of the Arcade Reply from mods to my prank bans in public: Reply from mods to my prank bans in private: MSN - evil_budgie @ hotmail.co.uk

22-07-2006, 04:25 AM	#29 (permalink)
superkingdave Hall of Fame Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Inflection Points - 2 Posts: 18,292	indeed my two main batsmen are comp/superb and feeble/mediocre (stamina/conc), __________________ Dave Mohammed >>>> You ▲

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Archived [18/10/06] : Battrick	DJellett	Battrick	10623	17-10-2006 12:20 PM

21-07-2006, 07:10 PM	#17 (permalink)
AussieDominance Banned Join Date: May 2006 Location: Sydney Posts: 3,746	no i mean that if you are to be successful you need at least competent cons/conc for everyone

21-07-2006, 08:14 PM	#18 (permalink)
Adamc Cricketer Of The Year Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: in the wind, so to speak Posts: 9,128	Rubbish.

21-07-2006, 08:37 PM	#19 (permalink)
AussieDominance Banned Join Date: May 2006 Location: Sydney Posts: 3,746	why?

21-07-2006, 09:16 PM	#21 (permalink)
AussieDominance Banned Join Date: May 2006 Location: Sydney Posts: 3,746	yeh i guess those are valid points but to be very successful you will have to have competent

22-07-2006, 03:24 AM	#26 (permalink)
Adamc Cricketer Of The Year Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: in the wind, so to speak Posts: 9,128	Haha. I can't really be bothered explaining why it's a rubbish theory, it just is. Maybe for an individual player to be highly successful they will need a competent+ secondary, but as far as teams go there's no need to have everyone at that level to be successful.

22-07-2006, 03:38 AM	#27 (permalink)
marc71178 Eyes not spreadsheets Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: England Posts: 56,346	I'm certainly hoping that's not the case, because I thought I had a team with fairly good secondaries, yet mine aren't close to the "golden position"

22-07-2006, 04:37 AM	#30 (permalink)
Robertinho Cricketer Of The Year Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Testing Forums into the Sunset Posts: 8,442	I have a proficient/resp batsman who does rubbish against IV attacks... go figure.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)