The words 'looks' and 'is' have different meanings though. Generally 'looks' requires further evidence to move on to 'is'. Hence its greater subjectiveness and our difference of opinion.
No, if you require evidence of where the ball pitches it doesn’t look plumb. Simple
Right, just like when it looks plumb and you find out there was the thinnest of inside edges via the DRS. It actually never looked plumb in the first place. No dismissal can ever 'look' out - what if it was a no ball.
Pretty much what I think, didn’t look right.
I haven't, but tell her I thought she was brilliant at Eurovision!
Nah, the dress was awful ?
I probably should have clarified - I thought it looked plumb at first viewing at full speed. Was fully expecting it to be not out after seeing the slow motion replays.
You and your mates need to get your eyes tested.I probably should have clarified - I thought it looked plumb at first viewing at full speed. Was fully expecting it to be not out after seeing the slow motion replays.
The analogy comes from personal experience. Obviously I wasn't the one who foolishly mistook a thin man with a beard for a woman though. It was a mate
We did, both for vision and venereal diseases after that episode.
So you sought definitive evidence? Looked or is?
Looked at first. Definitely wasn't after further evidence was provided. It was probably for the best though. She couldn't have children. Her insides were all wrong.
Middle stump? Played with a straight bat I’m guessing fella?
