• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

On what planet does 44 against Derbyshire indicate being in Test form?

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
I mean, it's more form than 0 against Derbyshire. I don't see anything about "test form" or anything. Though he was dropped on 19.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
And Auntie wonders why the government want to stop funding her - should stick to straight reporting rather than engaging in a bit of kidology to try and persuade the Australians to pick an out of form batsman for Edgbaston
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
And Auntie wonders why the government want to stop funding her - should stick to straight reporting rather than engaging in a bit of kidology to try and persuade the Australians to pick an out of form batsman for Edgbaston
Shane Watson wasn't mentioned once in the article?
 

Top