View Poll Results: Who will win?

Voters
39. You may not vote on this poll
  • England

    8 20.51%
  • Australia

    25 64.10%
  • Draw (crims retain)

    6 15.38%
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 119
Like Tree16Likes

Thread: 4th thread - who's going to win?

  1. #46
    Hall of Fame Member Pothas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Brum
    Posts
    15,510
    Woakes for Broad I might actually consider reasonable.

  2. #47
    Global Moderator harsh.ag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    India
    Posts
    12,294
    England's pace bowling is fine. Though Broad can be given a breather mid series. Might as well try Rashid if Ali doesn't work out in the first two tests.
    ~ Do you think I care for you so little that betraying me would make a difference ~

  3. #48
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    61,241
    Rashid continuing to benefit from the "not being in the side so abilities are inflated" phenomenon.
    Dan likes this.
    marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

    Anyone want to join the Society?

    Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.

  4. #49
    Global Moderator Spark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    A Blood Rainbow
    Posts
    44,601
    England's bowling is more of a concern than their batting IMO. Not because it's terrible or anything, just because at the moment it doesn't quite look good enough and it's hard to see it getting that much better. Both Anderson and Broad are looking tired, frankly, and whilst they're still fine Test bowlers, I have a feeling that Anderson's performance in this series - looked reasonable and asked questions, didn't take many wickets - will become increasingly the norm. Broad will probably continue being Broad and continue to bowl at an objectively similar level if an infinitely more infuriating manner.

    They'll be okay and cause problems, but whether they'll cause more than they did in 2013-4, I question, and they'll have to. The fact that they still show the tendency to fall apart and start mindlessly banging it short when attacked - and people talk as if Broad is the only offender, he isn't - will not have been missed. Nor will the fact that they don't have any spin options that won't be gleefully laid into by Smith, Clarke et al, exacerbating the tiredness issue even further (though Stokes helps in this regard).

    Neither will the most glaring issue of all be addressed, which is that despite what some people may like to tell themselves, England still do not have any bowlers who are remotely as good as those two. Remember when England's bowling depth was the ~next big thing~? What a time that was.
    Last edited by Spark; 03-06-2015 at 03:52 AM.
    Flem274* likes this.
    do you think people will be allowed to make violins?
    who's going to make the violins?

    forever 63*


  5. #50
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Flem274*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    BJ Watling's luxurious curls
    Posts
    36,332
    England once did have superb depth with fit Tremlett and Bresnan in the form of his life.

    No longer.

    England's only advantage is the engine room. Engine rooms work even with dukes which is interesting. The spuds in the batting of each side cancel each other out, and Australia have the better bowling attack on paper. England need to troll hard with that engine room.

    But yeah as I said, Australia just.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bahnz View Post
    I need u like Henry Nicholls needs batting school
    He was terrible in that series
    I need u like Ross Taylor needed to be fit
    He's way better than Henry Nicholls
    And now all I can think about is your smile
    and that ****** test series too
    Losing to Australia sucked and I miss you
    Proudly supporting Central Districts
    RIP Craig Walsh

  6. #51
    Hall of Fame Member Pothas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Brum
    Posts
    15,510
    Finn as well. What has happened, or not happened with Finn has been a huge damage to England.

  7. #52
    Global Moderator Spark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    A Blood Rainbow
    Posts
    44,601
    Yeah indeed. Would have been the absolute perfect 3rd seamer if he had continued his initial career trajectory.

  8. #53
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    SWA
    Posts
    57,352
    There's a Test at Trent Bridge isn't there? Jimmy will tear it up there at a minimum.

    Quote Originally Posted by Axl Rose
    The internet is a big garbage can


    RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.

  9. #54
    Cricketer Of The Year
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    england
    Posts
    8,776
    Quote Originally Posted by GIMH View Post
    There's a Test at Trent Bridge isn't there? Jimmy will tear it up there at a minimum.
    That's not until the 4thTest. He'll have been dropped by then.

  10. #55
    International Captain Riggins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    6,223
    Quote Originally Posted by Flem274* View Post
    England once did have superb depth with fit Tremlett and Bresnan in the form of his life.

    No longer.

    England's only advantage is the engine room. Engine rooms work even with dukes which is interesting. The spuds in the batting of each side cancel each other out, and Australia have the better bowling attack on paper. England need to troll hard with that engine room.

    But yeah as I said, Australia just.
    What's the engine room?
    The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament.

  11. #56
    International Regular Tangles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    63*
    Posts
    3,827
    Quote Originally Posted by Riggins View Post
    What's the engine room?
    Forward pack IMO. Need a good front row.

  12. #57
    Hall of Fame Member morgieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    63*
    Posts
    17,323
    Quote Originally Posted by Riggins View Post
    What's the engine room?
    Plunkett Shield for lower-middle order. Essentially bowling in New Zealand is very new ball reliant due to the fact that greentops dry out really easily and there's a lack of good spinners over there. Therefore top-order batting can be pretty tricky but middle-order batting can be a piece of piss at times.
    5-0

    Want to be the online Don Bradman or Ian Salisbury?
    Then join CW Cricket today. It's what all the cool kids desire.

    RIP Craig Walsh (Craig) 1985-2012
    RIP Hughesy 1988-2014

  13. #58
    Cricket Web Staff Member Burgey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Castle
    Posts
    52,667
    I think the series will be more even than recent results for the two sides would suggest. I have a couple of reasons for saying that, primarily the return to form of Cook, which is vital for England. He's a proper run machine when he gets going, and can bat ages. Root is obviously in fine form as well. Had Voges not debuted so well in the Windies overnight, I would have said it would be even closer: assuming Rogers comes back in, he and Voges provide some much needed experience and cool-headedness in the Aussie batting, far more so than if SMarsh was a fixture.

    I don't really have a problem with Australia's bowling at all. I think Lyon is better than the England spinners, and though I respect Anderson and Broad (particularly at home) I think Harris, Hazelwood and Johnson with support from Starc and whoever else can be flown in when required means we are well served for flingers.

    The biggest question marks for me remain around our batting in English conditions. Warner is plainly a gun player, but he played very little over there last time through his own stupidity. Watson's gonna Watson and Clarke obviously has his back issues. Ideally, our best available XI would IMO be:

    Bull
    Buck
    TPC
    Clarkeh
    16AF
    Twatto/ MMarsh
    Rad
    MJ
    Rhino
    WPNCOS
    Haaaaaaaaaaze

    That line up has oodles of run scoring potential but is unproven. This isn't like a 93 or 01 side where you could pencil in Taylor, Boonie, the Waughs and AB for bulk runs at some point. I see it more as a side which will need to bat well as a unit. As always, the key to a batting line up is number three. Until Australia gets a consistent number three they will always feel the loss of Ponting, and not just because he was such a great. It's because one fer isn't a big deal, but two fer always is.

    It was the same when Boon retired. Although Australia was still the best side in the world, the line up was prone to collapses until Ponting really found his way to consistency at three. I'm hoping TPC will do it. The bloke has become a seriously good test player now and has the game to play well in that position since he's begun leaving the ball so consistently. If you added Amla at three to that Australian side and moved the rest of the batting down a slot to omit either Voges or Watson, how good does it look? A gun number three makes a massive difference.

    The really interesting series' for Australia will be after the Ashes when Rogers and presumably Haddin retire. I'd hoped Silk would have had a better summer to warrant inclusion but he didn't so the second opening spot is up for grabs, and SuperNev seems a lock for the keeping job once Haddin goes.
    Last edited by Burgey; 04-06-2015 at 07:55 PM.
    WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie

    "Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn

    #408. Sixty three not out forever.

  14. #59
    Global Moderator Spark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    A Blood Rainbow
    Posts
    44,601
    Haha Amla added to that middle order would be downright frightening tbh.

  15. #60
    International Coach wpdavid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    11,016
    Quote Originally Posted by marc71178 View Post
    Rashid continuing to benefit from the "not being in the side so abilities are inflated" phenomenon.
    Anyone know Rashid's stats in the CC this season?

    And/or last season, come to that?
    Last edited by wpdavid; 05-06-2015 at 06:22 AM.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The put-down thread
    By Burgey in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-05-2017, 04:44 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 22-04-2014, 06:03 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 30-04-2013, 02:49 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19-05-2007, 05:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •