Cricket Player Manager
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 52 of 52
Like Tree1Likes

Thread: Best one-sided series?

  1. #46
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    57,896
    Yes, one that has rarely happened to actually prevent a whitewash.
    marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

    Anyone want to join the Society?

    Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.

  2. #47
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    just this side of cool
    Posts
    958
    Quote Originally Posted by marc71178 View Post
    Yes, one that has rarely happened to actually prevent a whitewash.
    Still makes this statement wrong >

    Quote Originally Posted by marc71178 View Post
    You do realise that for it be one-sided they need to actually win all the games don't you?

  3. #48
    Virat Kohli (c) Jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    55,715
    Bump.

    Good test albeit some attritional cricket at times. Test obviously not one sided like the previous tests but it was still somehow a comfortable win from Australia, but nevertheless I found it great viewing.
    "I am very happy and it will allow me to have lot more rice."

    Eoin Morgan on being given a rice cooker for being Man of the Match in a Dhaka Premier Division game.

  4. #49
    Global Moderator vic_orthdox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    25,555
    Quote Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad View Post
    Those stats are all fairly misleading though. Losing seven of the previous nine was due to the opposition/location rather than the general ****ness of the Australan team. They would still realistically have beaten most teams fairly comfortably, just not India and England away from home (or SA). The low career averages are mostly related to brief test careers, since for instance I doubt too many people would have thought Rogers and Smith looked like sub-37 career average players (though Rogers could easily end up that way). And the series in England was fairly evenly contested for a 3-0 result: only Lords was one-sided, England never scored over 400 once, had only one batsman averaging over 40 for the series, and Australia had the first innings lead in four out of five tests.

    Switch the home field advantage and add a bit of experience to the Australian team and I think the signs were there that it was going to be a close series. The real shock is the sheer one-sidedness. and Johnson. My memory of the 05/06 series was that up until Perth most people still thought England had a really good chance to win the series. Brisbane was a thrashing but England basically dominated the Adelaide test until the fourth day and should certainly never have lost it, and even bowled Australia out cheaply in Perth. By comparison this series has just felt non-competitive, mostly because of the abysmal batting performance.
    My memory of the aftermath of the Adelaide Test was that, while the win was awesome, it was almost disappointing as it spelt the end of a competitive series.


  5. #50
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,104
    Quote Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
    My memory of the aftermath of the Adelaide Test was that, while the win was awesome, it was almost disappointing as it spelt the end of a competitive series.
    Yeah probably poor phrasing on the Perth thing as the final day in Adelaide was just too dismal to come back from. My feeling up until day 4 of that test was that England might well win it and then Australia would have to play really well to get the momentum back in Perth. The last day changed the whole tone.
    I know a place where a royal flush
    Can never beat a pair

  6. #51
    International Captain OverratedSanity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Chennai, India
    Posts
    5,387
    Enjoyed the SL-WI series of 2001 a lot, purely for the way Lara batted

  7. #52
    Cricketer Of The Year wpdavid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    8,982
    Quote Originally Posted by marc71178 View Post
    How can a series be one sided but not finish in a whitewash (unless there's a huge weather interruption when a match is all but over?)
    Or a win when the series ha been decided - Ashes in 2002/03, 2001, 1993 and 1974/74 spring immediately to mind.

    Or a series can end up being one-sided after initially looking close, such as Aus beating WI 5-1 in 1975/6. Or England winning 5-1 in 1978/79 after Aus had brought it back to 2-1.

    Or simply the odd draw, such as the 1989 and 1990 Ashes.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Should the 2013/14 series be the final Ashes series held?
    By finalashes in forum Ashes 2013/2014
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 08-12-2013, 05:54 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-09-2007, 09:39 PM
  3. The brian Lara series vs cricket series
    By cover drive man in forum General
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-07-2007, 05:42 AM
  4. The 4 sided triangle
    By Pothas in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 85
    Last Post: 29-04-2006, 05:39 PM
  5. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 20-11-2005, 03:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •