![]() |
Adam Voges says the improved batting by the Aussies is due to the belief Boof is showing in them and the freedom in which he is allowing them to play.
Probably says more about Mickey Arthur than it does about Darren Lehmann.
I think it may have something to do with England having one limited overs bowler too.
Apparently a bright enough morning forecast, then cloudy with a few showers in the arvo.
As the Ashes tour moves onto its third Australian Prime Minister, we're expecting a blamy top of 14 in Brum, which is awful.
Brum I mean, not the forecast.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - JK Galbraith
"Do you know why I have credibility? Because I don't exude morality." - Bob Hawke
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blo...cricket-legacy
Brad McNamara @bbuzzmc
Will say this once and then nothing else. Defamation laws quite clear in Aus.be careful.
clarke and bailey played good ODI innings under Arthur. Finch played a low sample amount of matches under Arthur. Voges returned to the ODI team under Arthur. Marsh is still Marsh. There's no real improvement. Voges just towed the party line like players always do. It says more about him than it does Arthur.
They were just towing a different party.
It's long and it's dangly.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spor...-1226714819043
http://www.espncricinfo.com/magazine...ry/669357.html
"However, in Test and first-class cricket very few players are willing to embrace equally the disparate ambitions of personal success and entertaining the crowd. After such a brutal display of hitting, it's natural to wonder: why can't Finch do better in longer forms of the game?"
Last edited by wiff; 11-09-2013 at 01:26 AM. Reason: including straw man arguments
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)