was actually good bowling I think, Tredwell came a little wider of the crease and angled it in a bit, twas still pretty crappy on Finch's part thoughhow the **** did finch ever let that hit his pad, what rubbish cricket
But isn't that the nature of DRS, especially with LBWs? Any decision which is "umpires call" is the 'right' decision regardless because the umpire will always be backed up. I think we've all seen LBWs given though which are not overturned which we don't really think should have been given out (or sometimes, although more rarely, vice versa).Fair enough, but still not sure I buy it.
Umpires don't have to show their working out; the decision is either right or wrong. Beyond that we're into jesuitical semantics about what defines "good" and "bad" and corollaries thereof.
Surely it's the latter more than anything. Limited overs form or not, you can't justify picking a 26 year old averaging under 30. But he was captain for Australia A and Invers loves a bloke who can bowl a bit, so who the **** knows.So, Australian readers, are there supposed to be issues with Finch's technique that keep him out of test reckoning or is it just the lack of runs?
Looks to play pretty straight to me.
his footwork is pretty average imo, which is proabably why he's struggled to make any first class runs. Clearly has a very good eye though and is physically a big man so has no trouble clearing the boundary in white ball cricket.So, Australian readers, are there supposed to be issues with Finch's technique that keep him out of test reckoning or is it just the lack of runs?
Looks to play pretty straight to me.