Edit. I guess it would be someone who doesn't make runs because they always throw it away / play a **** shot rather than having a 'technical weakness exposed.' So someone like Marsh or Ferguson, but then again you would just say their technique is **** in that they consistently nick wide half volleys.
Last edited by Riggins; 28-08-2013 at 03:56 AM.
The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament.
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
I would have thought Rogers has possibly the best technique against fast bowling in Australia, especially against the swinging ball
Having a Rogers, Cook, Langer type opener in your test line up is certainly advantageous. Particularly if you can partner them with an aggressive right hander at the other end.
Last edited by Hooksey; 28-08-2013 at 04:42 AM.
On that basis Smith shouldn't have been selected for his debut, indeed.
But with that criteria he was an ideal selection for India, and once he impressed (which relatively speaking, he did) there he should have been selected for England (looking over the fact that he initially wasn't).
Parmi | #1 draft pick | Jake King is **** | Big Bash League tipping champion of the universeCome and Paint Turtle
Taken as being a tacit agreement.
Why wouldn't he be batting at five now, is my point.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"People make me happy.. not places.. people"
"When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)