Are we planning on destroying Clarke"s career my moving him up down every match(4 54545).He needs to continue batting where he is presently and that's at 4.Watson is not good as a pure batsman to be batting at 4.Clarke has to be in the top 4 surely. I'd stick with the same team maybe replace Bird with a fit Patto.
Its sad though that he keeps getting injured as I think he has the most potential of all our young quicks.Btw whats with Hazlewood ,was expecting him to be around the set up by now.Injury plague career so far.
Philhughesis...
? I don't see it personally.
Clarke plays best at 5. Twatto has been good enough as a specialist bat to open, so I'm pretty sure he's good enough to bat 4.
Hughes has had a lot of chances and that's fine as their isn't many people pushing past for selection. But to persist with someone with such a poor technique is foolish in the least. His home ground is Adelaide this year and to me that gives an extra few runs to his average for the year. There are others who are at that level to be given a chance.
the reason why phil hughes keeps on getting talked about. shaun marsh and mark cosgrove keep on being talked about and hughes isnt even fat or a drunk!the **** am I looking at here?
shield innings scores batting @ 3 , runs, innings, av.the **** am I looking at here?
I agree but unless he goes big today or tomorrow Uzi will get dropped. Hughes will probably get back in along with Faulkner just to really piss people off.
We'd have been over the ****ing moon if you'd have persisted with him in 2009
He's a bit of a problem child in recent times but Watson did pretty well when he came into the side for Hughes. Of course he still had the problems making 100's back then but his average was in the 40's for a long while
