superkingdave
Hall of Fame Member
Good decision
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
*Official* Fourth Test at Chester-le-Street
- Thread starter Spark
- Start date
Swingpanzee
International Regular
How is that not out? ****.
benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nah that was an Australian review.
Spark
Global Moderator
Nah that was our review
HeathDavisSpeed
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
And who said decision reviews slowed the game down. Fine some of these ****s FFS. It's not the time for a ****ing WI meeting about it.
andyc
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Geez it is an interesting one though. If an ump reckons it's hitting the stumps but the batsman's edged it and so gives it not out, and then it turns out the batsman hasn't edged it and it goes to umpires call, shouldn't it essentially be the same situation we're in now? As in the umpire's call would now be 'out?'
hazsa19
International Regular
No it's 1-2
There is an or in there.If it's 1-1 how will it be in favour of Australia?
HeathDavisSpeed
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
If it had been 3 reds, it would have been out. That's why.
NUFAN
Y no Afghanistan flag
ajdude
International Coach
hill thought it was out caught behind and not out LBW, therefore when he didn't edge it and it was umpires call it's not out
Swingpanzee
International Regular
Why wasn't it out, really? If the third umpire can check for either caught or LBW it should imply that the batsman can be given out for either? Pissweak Aleem Dar.
