wellAlbidarned
International Coach
We know that the closer the decision, the harder it is to make the right call. The umpire's call system is in place to discourage 50/50 reviews likely to cause controversey, nothing more.
Its amazing to think these blokes are actually getting paid money to be this inept and to no doubt continue to be utterly useless.Does anyone have any rational explanation as for how the **** that was overturned? This is as close to being conclusive as it gets to overturn a decision - he missed it by a ****ing mile without even hotspot or multiple camera angles. Unless it's drunk chimp on crack watching the replay, I have no idea how that could possibly have not been overturned.
I'm pretty much open to conspiracy theories now - it's that bad.
Neither of those incidents had anything to do with DRS though, they were part of the long standing 3rd umpire role.I know what you are saying there is technically correct, but the Bell catch by Smith and the Agar run out surely amount to the same thing.......a failure of the system we have in place now. I know neither of those were DRS reviews, but for all intents and purposes still amount to the same thing......just the umpires called for the reviews and not the players. The whole process still failed though.
I know that.......and the 3rd umpire role is where the referral system is failing, both with the DRS system and umpire referrals.Neither of those incidents had anything to do with DRS though, they were part of the long standing 3rd umpire role.
you wouldnt get 30-40 goals playing 30 hours of soccer over 5 days?Football is a terrible comparison given the rarity and importance of a goal.
And it's hardly a random chance of being overturned. This is the first DRS **** up this series. Yes it shouldn't happen, yes it's unacceptable but it's not as if 3rd umpires are flipping a coin ffs.
inb4 jokes about Watson's version of "doubt"