cricket betting betway blog banner small

View Poll Results: Would you sub out Nathan Lyon for Trent Bridge?

27. You may not vote on this poll
  • No - Lyon has been dicked around with enough

    19 70.37%
  • Yes - Lyon for Faulkner

    0 0%
  • Yes - Lyon for Starc

    1 3.70%
  • Yes - Lyon for Bird

    4 14.81%
  • Programmatic specificity will lead Labor to victory

    3 11.11%
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 66 of 66
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Australia - should they field four quicks?

  1. #61
    International Coach uvelocity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    seamy road
    spikeys shook. boof has him running scared. good signs
    Quote Originally Posted by sledger View Post
    I just love all kinds of balls.

  2. #62
    International Coach wellAlbidarned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    the line
    Starc is not good enough to be in a three man pace attack at the moment. He only has two modes - either he's blowing batsmen away with crazy extravagant movement and pace or dishing up tasty 140kph half volleys. He'll get there eventually but he's a bit of a liability at the moment when not in god mode.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Neesham
    Root always sets up the innings well. It's nice having BJ down the order to finish the innings off.
    Exit pursuing a beer

  3. #63
    International Captain Ruckus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Starc wouldn't be a bad option in a 4 man pace attack, but yeah in a 3 man attack with Pattinson (who can still have bad spells) and a seemingly out of form Siddle, it's just a bad idea imo. They have to play Harris. I don't see what the reasoning could be if they don't. He is a clear-cut better bowler than both Siddle and Starc and performed well in his first tour match. If they are concerned about injury then I don't even understand why he is even in the squad. You either accept Harris for the injury-prone bowler he is and play him whenever you can anyway (which is what has happened in the past with good success), or you simply don't have him in the picture.
    hendrix and morgieb like this.

  4. #64
    International Captain adub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    a parallel universe where Andrew Hilditch was a good chairman of selectors
    Exactly. Harris has to be either in the test side or the hospital ward.

  5. #65
    Hall of Fame Member morgieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Agree with Albi and Ruckus here.

    Ideally I'd go with Bird/Harris/Pattinson but I can deal with Siddle. Starc just feels like a liability though in a 4-man attack + Watson and some other 6th bowler.

    Want to be the online Don Bradman or Ian Salisbury?
    Then join CW Cricket today. It's what all the cool kids desire.

    RIP Craig Walsh (Craig) 1985-2012
    RIP Hughesy 1988-2014

  6. #66
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Top_Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Marburg, Germany
    If Harris doesn't bowl the house down and Starc takes another bag against Worcs, reckon Starc's going to play the first Test. Siddle and Pattinson are nailed on so it comes down to those two.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Dangerous on their day- Quicks
    By Goughy in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 30-12-2010, 11:29 PM
  2. 3 quicks
    By ret in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 17-06-2008, 04:13 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 13-03-2007, 06:01 PM
  4. India's Quicks - what do you think?
    By deeps in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-07-2006, 06:11 AM
  5. who are the genuine 'quicks'?????
    By anzac in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-03-2003, 02:50 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts