NRL Tipping Champion 2014
Over 0.2: Putland to Nevill, OUT, no run, full ball swings in late to crash into his pads. Nevill is almost falling over trying to get bat on it but can't. Huge shout for LBW and Umpire Martell eventually raises the finger! P.Nevill - lbw b:Putland 0 (1 ball, 1 minute).
Cheers. He's a genuine Roger Ramjet isn't he?
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"People make me happy.. not places.. people"
"When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
"What is this what is this who is this guy shouting what is this going on in here?" - CP. (re: psxpro)
R.I.P Craigos, you were a champion bloke. One of the best
R.I.P Fardin 'Bob' Qayyumi
Member of the Church of the Holy Glenn McGrath
"How about you do something contstructive in this forum for once and not fill the forum with ****. You offer nothing." - theegyptian.
I thought that was the consensus on here.
Either that or I just read far too many Burgey posts.
As for Burgey's point on Bell - bloke has played some bloody crucial innings for England in recent times but rather than be the mentally piss-weak player he used to be, he's developed into the high-school flirt. Looks good, leads you on enough but never takes you home.
I also think elegance can be a misconception of talent. Sure, him driving a ball through cover is greater eye candy than Cook doing the same. But does that really make him more talented?
Of course, maybe I'm just judging why people think he's talented the wrong way. If so, I'd love to hear what it is exactly that makes him more talented than most.
I don't like the term anyway, actually. Flem was right.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)