Daniel Brettig: "Siddle is the vital glue for a bowling attack that needs experience and consistency to balance the talent of Hazlewood, Starc, James Pattinson and Pat Cummins. Hopefully Lehmann and company will now remember this"
Cheers. He's a genuine Roger Ramjet isn't he?
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
R.I.P Craigos, you were a champion bloke. One of the best
R.I.P Fardin 'Bob' Qayyumi
Member of the Church of the Holy Glenn McGrath
"How about you do something contstructive in this forum for once and not fill the forum with ****. You offer nothing." - theegyptian.
"There's more chance of SoC making a good post than Smith averaging 99.95." - Furball
"**** you're such a **** poster." - Furball
I thought that was the consensus on here.
Either that or I just read far too many Burgey posts.
One is too many
Originally Posted by John King
RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
As for Burgey's point on Bell - bloke has played some bloody crucial innings for England in recent times but rather than be the mentally piss-weak player he used to be, he's developed into the high-school flirt. Looks good, leads you on enough but never takes you home.
I also think elegance can be a misconception of talent. Sure, him driving a ball through cover is greater eye candy than Cook doing the same. But does that really make him more talented?
Of course, maybe I'm just judging why people think he's talented the wrong way. If so, I'd love to hear what it is exactly that makes him more talented than most.
I don't like the term anyway, actually. Flem was right.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)