Page 61 of 180 FirstFirst ... 1151596061626371111161 ... LastLast
Results 901 to 915 of 2691
Like Tree35Likes

Thread: *Official* Road to 2013 Ashes

  1. #901
    International Captain LongHopCassidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Nursing a broken ****ing arm
    Posts
    5,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Monk View Post
    - Warner
    - Cowan
    - Cosgrove
    - Bailey
    - Clarke
    - Haddin
    - Watson (full bowling capacity or FO)
    - Pattinson
    - Starc
    - Bird
    - Lyon
    "The Australian cricket captain is the Prime Minister Australia wishes it had. Steve Waugh is that man, Michael Clarke is not." - Jarrod Kimber

    RIP Fardin Qayyumi and Craig Walsh - true icons of CricketWeb.

  2. #902
    International Vice-Captain Monk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,814
    Quote Originally Posted by watson View Post
    Yeah, time to blood a new top-order batsman. Let's face it, we've got nothing to lose.
    Just need some techniques that will lead to a bit of consistency imo. Cosgrove and Bailey have those techniques.

  3. #903
    International Coach
    Suicide Bob Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not really needed on CW
    Posts
    12,701
    drop 4 guys for being lazy and irresponsible ****s

    pick cosgrove

  4. #904
    International Coach social's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    12,485
    I really dont see why Watto wouldnt be fit to bowl in time for the Ashes as IIRC, his last 2 injuries have been to the calf muscle and worst case scenario, they require an operation and 3-4 months recovery

    Given that it obviously isnt all that serious (he would have had an operation if it was), he should probably be fit to bowl today let alone by July

    IMO, selectors need to get tough with him and not select him unless he is fit to bowl as his batting output alone doesnt justify his place


  5. #905
    International Vice-Captain Monk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,814
    Quote Originally Posted by Daemon View Post
    drop 4 guys for being lazy and irresponsible ****s

    pick cosgrove

    Nup, they've got it all wrong.

    Drop guys who can't bat very well.

    Pick guys who can.

  6. #906
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    48,748
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    Been having a debate with my friend on this point. Curious to see CW's view.

    Will any Australian fast bowler play 5 Ashes tests - not taking into account injury? By that I mean, will any fast bowler not be rotated/rested?

    I reckon that a fast bowler will play 5 tests but my mate doesn't.
    It's bad enough we have to read Burgey's opinions without you feeling the need to ****ing share them as well. Seriously lad, quieten down.
    Quote Originally Posted by DingDong View Post
    gimh has now surpassed richard as the greatest cw member ever imo

    RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.

  7. #907
    International Debutant Viscount Tom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Leeds, G.O.C.
    Posts
    2,433
    Quote Originally Posted by social View Post
    I really dont see why Watto wouldnt be fit to bowl in time for the Ashes as IIRC, his last 2 injuries have been to the calf muscle and worst case scenario, they require an operation and 3-4 months recovery

    Given that it obviously isnt all that serious (he would have had an operation if it was), he should probably be fit to bowl today let alone by July

    IMO, selectors need to get tough with him and not select him unless he is fit to bowl as his batting output alone doesnt justify his place
    Its Watson he'll find a way to become unfit to bowl.
    AT-XI
    #J.Hobbs; #L.Hutton; #D.Bradman; #V.Richards; #G.Sobers; #A.Border; #A.Gilchrist; #K.Miller; #I.Khan; #S.Warne; #M.Marshall;

  8. #908
    International Coach pup11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    India
    Posts
    12,146
    Batsmen: Clarke, Hughes, Rogers, Warner, Bailey, David Hussey/Voges
    Fast-bowlers: Pattinson, Siddle, Faulkner, Hilfenhaus, Coulter-Nile
    Wicket-keepers: Wade, Haddin
    Spinners: O'keefe, Agar/Boyce
    All-rounders: Watson, Mitch Marsh

    One thing that we should learn from the Indian experience is that, when playing away from home in tough conditions nothing can make up for experience. If we take a side to the Ashes similar to the one we took over to India, then sure we might compete a little better in English conditions but we certainly won't be winning many games there.

    My 17 man squad is mostly made up of players who have consistent performances behind them over a period of time and yet each of them brings a different skill-set to the side.

    Rogers has to picked ahead of Cowan becuase not only would he fill the role of the gritty opener that Cowan is currently playing in the side, but he unlike Cowan after getting a start won't throw it away and instead would most probably turn those starts into big hundreds, sure he is 35 and hence nothing more than a stop-gap measure but he without doubt is the best opener in Australia atm, so he has to play.

    Bailey, David Hussey and Voges are three of the best middle order batsmen in Australia over the last few years and Voges and Hussey also have extensive experience of playing in England so that certainly would help as well, with Bailey we would not only be getting a pretty solid middle order batsman, but he also would fill the huge leadership void that's there in the side atm and hence provide some much needed support to someone like Clarke who basically seems to have too much on his plate with his off-field and on-field duties.

    Haven't considered Starc or Bird becuase of their injuries which are unlikely to be fixed in time for the Ashes, Harris and Cummins because of their injury prone history too aren't viable choices for a 5 test series. Hilf and Sid are tried and tested blokes and they have previous experience of the English conditions, Patto would be the enforcer in the bowling attack.Faulkner brings the left arm variety into the team and being a seam/swing bowler the conditons should suit him, even in dry bowling conditions he can keep the batsmen guessing by bowling his cutters, Coulter-Nile on other hand is someone who can bowl with some serious pace and reverse the old ball, so he would be very handy even if conditions aren't favorable for fast bowling.

    Haddin is going to start of as my keeper in this series, not only is he an experienced player but his glove work too is pretty good compared to Wade's. I think Wade is a massive player for Australia going forward but his keeping could get brutally exposed in the English conditions where the ball tends to wobble a lot in the air, having said that if he Haddin continues batting in brain dead fashion then it would pretty hard for him to retain his place in the side for too long.

    SOK 'just' has to be our #1 spinner for the Ashes, I think Lyon not only has lost a lot of confidence but he is looking anything like the bowler who made his debut in Sri Lanka, he needs to go back to shield cricket and try to comeback as a better player. Agar or Boyce both of them are promising young spinners and being the part of the squad even if they don't play a game could help them to a great extent to eventually kick-start their international career.

    Have picked Watson as an all-rounder because if he doesn't bowl then its hard to see him getting picked as a batsmen in the side, Mitch Marsh is more of a gamble, he has a pretty ordinary FC record but he is one of those players who could win us a game on his own, to go along with his batting his meduim pace bowling is pretty handy as well.

    All in all picking the best and the more experinced blokes from our available pool of players is our best bet of doing well during the Ashes in England and hopefully our selectors would learn from their mistakes and do the needful.

  9. #909
    International Coach social's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    12,485
    I really dont understand the fuss about either Coulter-Nile or Faulkner (well, tbf, it's only you and Warnie )

    NCN is quick but erratic and hardly moves the ball at all whilst Faulkner is no better than the 4th best bowler in Tassie

    I also think that people need to stop talking about Rogers as he is highly unlikely to be picked and that is probably overstating his chances
    Last edited by social; 21-03-2013 at 06:42 AM.

  10. #910
    International 12th Man Tangles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Polar Vortex
    Posts
    1,635
    Hussey and Voges are too old also. Hussey looks to be past his best anyway. Pretty sure they Starc was having the op now to be fit for the Ashes.

    Ideally Haddin wouldnt be picked either but Wade is the worst Aussie keeper I can remember seeing. IMO Haddin needs to be 1st choice if selected and Wade can spend the off season working on his glovework. Pick one of the other State keepers and take them to back up Haddin. Won't happen but it should.

  11. #911
    Cricketer Of The Year Cabinet96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    9,722
    Experience didn't help India much on their recent away tours tbf.

  12. #912
    School Boy/Girl Captain
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    134
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    I know we won't but anyone who thinks the Aussies will be able to get enough runs with their weak batting line up is kidding themselves. Aussies will win a match but lose the series.

    They still have the best bastman in the world.......

    It's easy to say they will all fail, but the fact remains, they still have some dangerous types. If Hughes and Warner hit some form, anything is possible. Warner alone can win a test in a session.


    Despite all the mud flinging etc, England is alot more comparable to their home conditions to that of India.

    The last time a world class pace attack went to England, the home side had their pants pulled down. I can see Pattinson having similar results, he's the best young quick in the world by an absolute mile.

    The New Zealand trip to England will be watched very closely, because at times, the NZ batsmen have made Jimmy, Broad and co look pretty military medium at times....


    For all the bagging of Australias batting lineup, England will enter this Ashes series with 1 bowler averaging under 30, with Swan @ 29.

    Pattinson (21), Harris (24), Siddle (28) is a pretty big difference, the proof will be in the pudding I guess.
    Last edited by sphynx; 21-03-2013 at 05:36 PM.

  13. #913
    International Debutant theegyptian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,017
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabinet96 View Post
    Experience didn't help India much on their recent away tours tbf.
    yes but their players were on a downward spiral and even failed at home losing to england with those experienced players. Aus would be well served by having a bit more experience. Then again all of the batting by my reckoning will have had experience of England through either county, odi,test or a cricket. The young bowlers have less experience but most of them have some experience.


    Quote Originally Posted by sphynx View Post
    They still have the best bastman in the world.......

    It's easy to say they will all fail, but the fact remains, they still have some dangerous types. If Hughes and Warner hit some form, anything is possible. Warner alone can win a test in a session.


    Despite all the mud flinging etc, England is alot more comparable to their home conditions to that of India.

    The last time a world class pace attack went to England, the home side had their pants pulled down. I can see Pattinson having similar results, he's the best young quick in the world by an absolute mile.

    The New Zealand trip to England will be watched very closely, because at times, the NZ batsmen have made Jimmy, Broad and co look pretty military medium at times....
    Debatable whether Clarke is the best. And he's got a chronic back problem that will affect the rest of his career.

    You're also clutching at straws when you say Australia have dangerous types. I'm sure some would call Maxwell a dangerous player. Warner has looked awful early on against Kumar. He's fine when he can just hit through the line on true and fast wickets

    By all accounts England have the more proven world class internationals and home advantage. They should win and that is why they are very strong favourites with the bookmakers. But nothing is certain and it wouldn't surprise if Australia won. England have been pretty unpredictable over the last couple of years.

  14. #914
    School Boy/Girl Captain
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    134
    Quote Originally Posted by theegyptian View Post
    yes but their players were on a downward spiral and even failed at home losing to england with those experienced players. Aus would be well served by having a bit more experience. Then again all of the batting by my reckoning will have had experience of England through either county, odi,test or a cricket. The young bowlers have less experience but most of them have some experience.




    Debatable whether Clarke is the best. And he's got a chronic back problem that will affect the rest of his career.

    You're also clutching at straws when you say Australia have dangerous types. I'm sure some would call Maxwell a dangerous player. Warner has looked awful early on against Kumar. He's fine when he can just hit through the line on true and fast wickets

    By all accounts England have the more proven world class internationals and home advantage. They should win and that is why they are very strong favourites with the bookmakers. But nothing is certain and it wouldn't surprise if Australia won. England have been pretty unpredictable over the last couple of years.
    It's not really debatable. He's made a 91, and a ton this series despite the back problem, he's hit 10 centuries in the last 18 months in 4 different countries, including 3 doubles and a triple. His 151 in Cape Town is the highest rated century of the last 4 years, smashed 3 100+ year old ground records in Australia as well as Ponting's Australian calender run record.

    He's had this back problem since he was 17, he's managed it fine so far in his career, the way he's been pummeling any ordinary pace bowling in the last 2 years, I can't see him being too worried by Broad and Finn.

    You're also clutching at straws when you say Australia have dangerous types. I'm sure some would call Maxwell a dangerous player. Warner has looked awful early on against Kumar. He's fine when he can just hit through the line on true and fast wickets
    Maxwell doesn't average over 40 in test cricket.

    He's not half the batsmen of Warner and have anything near the FC record Hughes does.
    Last edited by sphynx; 21-03-2013 at 06:24 PM.

  15. #915
    International Debutant theegyptian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,017
    Quote Originally Posted by sphynx View Post
    It's not really debatable. He's made a 91, and a ton this series despite the back problem, he's hit 10 centuries in the last 18 months in 4 different countries, including 3 doubles and a triple. His 151 in Cape Town is the highest rated century of the last 4 years, including all the other stuff.

    Amla is no.1 in both formats according to the official rankings.He has also been more consistent over a longer period. Clarke might be the better batsman but to say it isn't even debatable is stupid

    He's had this back problem since he was 17, either way, the way he's been pummeling any ordinary pace bowling in the last 2 years, I can't see him being too worried by Broad and Finn.

    Yes the back is only getting worse especially with Australi's workload over the next 9 months. Clarke gonna miss the IPL?

    Maxwell doesn't average over 40 in test cricket.

    He's not half the batsmen of Warner and Hughes.
    yes i agree but putting your hopes in two guys who are pretty much unproven on an international level to win you test matches sounds like clutching at straws to me.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Home Ashes to return to free-to-air TV
    By four_or_six in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 17-11-2009, 10:11 AM
  2. Ashes Coming Home
    By SurreyFan in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28-09-2009, 05:41 AM
  3. Herald Sun's Top 50 Ashes Legends
    By The Sean in forum Ashes 2009
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 17-07-2009, 01:53 PM
  4. The Google Ashes
    By superkingdave in forum Ashes 2009
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 30-06-2009, 01:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •