Warner is easily Australia's best opening batsman for me, but it's a tricky one because he's not playing in the warm ups. I assume the ban is just from Australia games? Therefore, there's nothing technically stopping him playing a bit of club cricket in England or something like that? Wouldn't be the worst idea for me.
RIP Philip Hughes - 1988-2014
It's just so ****ing annoying the bonehead had to have that stupid night out. Arrrrg. I don't think it matters that much he wouldn't have had proper practice, but it's just unnecessary complication that we didn't need. Especially seeing as though I would definitely include him in the small bunch of key players we have going into this series.
Is there any chance we'll see this by the third or fourth test?
Tremlett on the TV, and he isn't limping
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.
Lehmann has said Watson will open. That would likely mean one of Hughes, Cowan or Rogers will miss out.
Somerset v Australians, Taunton, 1st Day : Shane Watson to open in Ashes - Darren Lehmann | Cricket News | Australia in England - The Investec Ashes | ESPN Cricinfo
So, like I've been saying, Cowan's gone. Nothing short of a very big lot of runs in the warm-ups can save him from the Roginator now.
The fast bowling situation is a tricky one. I wouldn't want Faulkner anywhere near the side, including at number six. Patto is a lock. Harris should be picked, but will inevitably break down. Bird's form has been wonderful. Starc can run through a side. And Siddle is vego-dependable.
I don't think we can go wrong really. I'd probably go Patto-Harris-Bird, but can understand the justification for the others.
Jesus brings life eternal
remembering the life of Phil 'The Prince' Hughes
Unless the plan is Watson, Cowan and Rogers at 3. What would be interesting is him saying that Warner will play with no lead up cricket.
Warner at 3.
You heard me.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)