Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Rejecting 'selection deontology' since Mar '15
'Stats' is not a synonym for 'Career Test Averages'
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Tucker
Any team with a decent attack is a chance to win test matches. If you take 20 wickets consistently you're a show. The series will be decided primarily on how well Australia's bowlers adjust to English conditions. England won't beat Australia by 170 runs posting two 200-odd scores. It'll be a tight series which I expect us to scrape through and win 4-0 with England holding out nine down in the other match.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
Like all englishmen, Corrin and GF wish they were Australian.
Australia pushed South Africa on Australian pitches, the Sth African attack is 10 x the crap being served up by England in the last 2 series.......
Pattinson and Harris both average under 24 with the ball......... Siddle averages 28.
The English bowlers have hardly swung the thing this test, Harris swings the Kookaburra during cloudless days in Brisbane, day after day.
The Duke has always swung more because of the smaller seam and the clear coat they put on the thing....
Pattinson and Harris will be the two best bowlers in this series................
Last edited by sphynx; 26-05-2013 at 06:13 AM.
cool story bro......
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)