Cricket Player Manager
Page 113 of 180 FirstFirst ... 1363103111112113114115123163 ... LastLast
Results 1,681 to 1,695 of 2691
Like Tree35Likes

Thread: *Official* Road to 2013 Ashes

  1. #1681
    Hall of Fame Member NUFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Marrickville
    Posts
    18,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Spikey View Post
    like i said before, I don't get the point of Faulkner's selection. McDonald, Agar or Hilf would have made more sense. Faulkner batting @ 7 in an attack with 5 bowlers does not make sense
    If he takes wickets it makes sense.

    Picking a cricketer in a squad who's had a good season and performed in the Shield Final and has been a part of a winning culture does actually make sense.

    Faulkner has ticked most of the hyperthetical boxes.
    NRL Tipping Champion 2014

    Over 0.2: Putland to Nevill, OUT, no run, full ball swings in late to crash into his pads. Nevill is almost falling over trying to get bat on it but can't. Huge shout for LBW and Umpire Martell eventually raises the finger! P.Nevill - lbw b:Putland 0 (1 ball, 1 minute).

  2. #1682
    Hall of Fame Member chaminda_00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Murali CG
    Posts
    16,305
    Quote Originally Posted by NUFAN View Post
    If he takes wickets it makes sense.

    Picking a cricketer in a squad who's had a good season and performed in the Shield Final and has been a part of a winning culture does actually make sense.

    Faulkner has ticked most of the hyperthetical boxes.
    Do you think he is good enough to bat at 7 in Test matches though.
    The man, the mountain, the Mathews. The greatest all rounder since Keith Miller. (Y)

    Jaffna Jets CC (Battrick & FTP)

    RIP WCC and CW Cricket

    Member of the MSC, JMAS and CVAAS

  3. #1683
    Hall of Fame Member NUFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Marrickville
    Posts
    18,376
    Quote Originally Posted by chaminda_00 View Post
    Do you think he is good enough to bat at 7 in Test matches though.
    Ideally Faulkner is a number 8 bat and that's where I would pick him in HIS best couple of scenarios so it doesn't really matter that he's not quite good enough at 7.

    Basically for a guy who's not good enough at 7, he's a terrific number 8.

  4. #1684
    Hall of Fame Member NUFAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Marrickville
    Posts
    18,376
    Just to add to my point, someone like Ian Healy had a career Shield record similar to Faulkners and he was a decent enough Test number 7. Faulkner is also improving on his record and an average of 34 for the year shows improvement in a bowler dominant season.

    At 22 years of age Faulkner has the ability to bat at 7 if we really wanted our keeper at 6 at some point down the track but I wouldn't risk it this Ashes series unless there were exceptional circumstances.

    I have it in my mind that there will be atleast one pitch this Ashes that will suit Faulkner perfectly. It might be a Test where we factor in Faulkners batting to pick him ahead of Lyon.


  5. #1685
    International Regular adub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,038
    I wouldn't see Faulkner in our best side at this stage, but talk of him being an undeserving selection is way off base. As you say Nufan he's performed and done it in the Shield Final. Actually three times. In the last three seasons Tassie have played three Shield Finals for two wins. He made 71 and took 4/117 in his first Shield Final, 21 and 3 and took 5/91 in his second Shield Final, and 46 and 89 and 4/60 in his third Shield Final. That's crazy. In each of those seasons, Faulkner has been awarded Tasmania's player of the year. Unheard of stuff and he's not yet 23!

    No I don't think he's right for 7, and like I said I think we have a better pace attack without him at this stage, but you've got to give it to him, he's a performer. He deserves to be going to England and may even make a real contribution over there, but yes probably should only be considered as a head to head with Starc at 8 (or maybe Lyon if there's no Watson and we're thinking four quicks). Very different bowler obviously, but also a much more consistent wicket taker in red ball cricket at this stage, shouldn't be discounted just because he's not as tall or quick. There are other ways to get wickets and Faulks has found some that work pretty well.

    Oh and before anyone goes on about bowling at Bellerieve his away Shield ave is 23.10 with a s/r of 48 so he's not just a home ground hero. One to watch.

  6. #1686
    Hall of Fame Member chaminda_00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Murali CG
    Posts
    16,305
    There nothing wrong with Faulkner's bowling. I would personally have him in front of Sayers as specialist bowler. But his not being picked as specialist bowler and is unlikely to be batting at 8 or below. If he makes the side it will be as 5th bowler, batting at 7.

    I agree that his batting record is on par with Healy, as is someone like Hartley. But it is not the 90s anymore and standard required at No 7 is higher now.

  7. #1687
    The artist formerly known as Monk Red Hill's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    5,118
    Gideon Haigh agrees with me about the Jackson Bird/Terry Alderman similarities.

    If Bird plays all 5 tests, I'm backing him to take close to 30 wickets.

  8. #1688
    International Captain Maximas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Footmarks
    Posts
    6,398
    Let's not get carried away with Faulkner here, I'm not sure he is above Sayers as a bowler for example (who took 48 wickets bowling at the Adelaide Oval half his matches this season). He deserved selection after 3 good SS seasons though.
    There are two colours in my head

    Sugarealm

  9. #1689
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Locked up inside my opium den, surrounded by some Chinamen
    Posts
    45,329
    Quote Originally Posted by Spikey View Post
    guys, this picture

    Jesus. Sez something about the moral fibre of a squad when Brad Haddin looks the least wankerish amongst you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Burgey View Post
    Looks like Bird's head has been stuck on two minutes before the pic was taken.
    Yeah, might just be the pic, but the looks to have a massive nappa in it. Huge head for his body.

    Quote Originally Posted by Burgey View Post
    Bird gonna tear it up over there if he's picked. Deadset perfect method for England.

    The new McGrath

    #nopressure
    New Paul Reiffel, IMHO.

    Would seriously have him ahead of Siddle and Starc for our conditions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maximas View Post
    England have tried some different young batsmen with limited success, I've been disappointed with Bairstow but I though James Taylor looked OK against SA. Root is obviously the pick of them and Compton seems to be able to hold his own. Their bowling is very settled and very good, but they struggled in NZ at times, It's hard to predict much about England before the home series against NZ, so we'll soon see...
    It's an interesting opinion.

    Thought he looked way out of his depth, tbh.
    Cricket Web's 2013/14 Premier League Tipping Champion

    - As featured in The Independent.

    "I don't believe a word of Pietersen's book, but then I don't believe a word anyone else has said either."
    - Simon Barnes renders further comment on KP's autobiography superfluous in a sentence

  10. #1690
    International Coach uvelocity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    seamy road
    Posts
    12,018
    good post from ad00b
    Quote Originally Posted by sledger View Post
    I just love all kinds of balls.

  11. #1691
    International Captain Maximas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Footmarks
    Posts
    6,398
    Yeah Taylor didn't look that great, but he held up an end well at Headingly. I think his temperament was excellent but his technique was more suited to division 2 county bowlers rather than the SA attack.

  12. #1692
    U19 Captain burr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    609
    Quote Originally Posted by adub View Post
    I wouldn't see Faulkner in our best side at this stage, but talk of him being an undeserving selection is way off base. As you say Nufan he's performed and done it in the Shield Final. Actually three times. In the last three seasons Tassie have played three Shield Finals for two wins. He made 71 and took 4/117 in his first Shield Final, 21 and 3 and took 5/91 in his second Shield Final, and 46 and 89 and 4/60 in his third Shield Final. That's crazy. In each of those seasons, Faulkner has been awarded Tasmania's player of the year. Unheard of stuff and he's not yet 23!

    No I don't think he's right for 7, and like I said I think we have a better pace attack without him at this stage, but you've got to give it to him, he's a performer. He deserves to be going to England and may even make a real contribution over there, but yes probably should only be considered as a head to head with Starc at 8 (or maybe Lyon if there's no Watson and we're thinking four quicks). Very different bowler obviously, but also a much more consistent wicket taker in red ball cricket at this stage, shouldn't be discounted just because he's not as tall or quick. There are other ways to get wickets and Faulks has found some that work pretty well.

    Oh and before anyone goes on about bowling at Bellerieve his away Shield ave is 23.10 with a s/r of 48 so he's not just a home ground hero. One to watch.
    Agree. Good post.
    'It is hard to recall a batsman quite so serene, so unrushed, so unflappable.' Chris Ryan on ... look to the left. Ahhhh.

  13. #1693
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Spikey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    All Glory To The Nev
    Posts
    33,499
    and the most interesting Ashes battle has already started, with Swanneh opening up an early lead

    England in a tizz over Cowan


    Swanneh 1, Burgey 0.
    Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?

    With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left

  14. #1694
    International Coach uvelocity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    seamy road
    Posts
    12,018
    maybe he's double crossing them

  15. #1695
    International Coach social's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    12,803
    Can understand why Swann doesnt want to bowl at Cowan at Notts training

    He averages 65 at Trent Bridge (Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo) and would be spanked everywhere by the bearded destroyer



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Home Ashes to return to free-to-air TV
    By four_or_six in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 17-11-2009, 11:11 AM
  2. Ashes Coming Home
    By SurreyFan in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28-09-2009, 06:41 AM
  3. Herald Sun's Top 50 Ashes Legends
    By The Sean in forum Ashes 2009
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 17-07-2009, 02:53 PM
  4. The Google Ashes
    By superkingdave in forum Ashes 2009
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 30-06-2009, 02:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •