Go Back   Cricket Web > Archived Forums > Archived Forums > Ashes 2010-2011



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2010, 04:45 AM   #31 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Burgey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Castle
Posts: 35,141
The amazing thing about Crayfish getting punted was, iirc, it came after he bowled badly at Perth. Perth ffs!! At least he gives it a rip.
__________________
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"People make me happy.. not places.. people"

"When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson
"Oh my God, there's a castle! A castle!"
Burgey is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 04:59 AM   #32 (permalink)
International Coach
 
NUFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 13,753
Agree with Noble One.

Jack, how would you rate Beer's batting and fielding?

His limited batting record doesn't look too good at all, Is he likely to bat at 11 if selected? Also how ahout his fielding, is he a specialist in any position?
NUFAN is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:15 AM   #33 (permalink)
School Boy/Girl Cricketer
 
Bloody Hell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
You're very reliant on stats aren't you?

Have you watched Beer bowl?

I'm not defending his decision, as I've only seen him bowl for a little bit once, but judging your outrage purely on stats is pretty one dimensional imo.
He bowls darts?!?...who needs stats.
Bloody Hell is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:23 AM   #34 (permalink)
School Boy/Girl Cricketer
 
Bloody Hell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Abu Dhabi, UAE
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant0r View Post
O'Keefe must have hit on Hilditch's daughter or something.

I'd be happy to concede if Beer does well. Having seen both Doherty and O'Keefe before Doherty was preferred, I was rather confused.
This is the thing that really gets my goat.

Why not pick the guy who has played 10 FC games, is averaging over 55 with the bat and under 25 with the ball???

Who played England this tour for Australia A and was probably the pick of the Aussie players with bat and ball???

Has shown composure and class at this level???

If only the Australian selectors have stated that a left arm orthodox bowler was what they saw as an intergral part of the future of the team....hang on

Obviously all the whining from the other states has forced a cap on the number of NSW players that can represent Australia. Guess they'll have to continue with the outright victories for the rest of the season thanks to guys like Khawaja, O'Keefe (with Smith's omission) and Copeland...(and Cameron if you think he's of test standard), while australia struggles to keep it's head above water.

Beer could yet come out and take 10 for the match - but considering his previous effort against England...can't see it.

Don't think I've had a selection in any sport/team piss me off as much as this one.
Bloody Hell is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:39 AM   #35 (permalink)
U19 Cricketer
 
Oscillatingmind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 421
I wish the best for Beer. But ****. everything has been said.

They clearly are picking purely on their personal belief in players, not what they've done, which I guess isn't wrong but at they same time they've showed their inept at picking the right guy anyway (Doherty). So following the shield as a form guide, seeing people get wickets (Copeland) and runs (Dussey) or maybe even some wickets and runs (O'Keefe) whatever might indicate something.

Beer...

Quote:
"(Johnson's poor test after good shield performance) That exposes the difference between international and domestic cricket and it's something we have to deal with these players every day of the week," - Nielsen.
__________________
With much love & smiles.
Oscillatingmind is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:43 AM   #36 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Adamc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the wind, so to speak
Posts: 9,129
Haha, this is fascinating. Is there any evidence he was even on the selectors' radar before Warne mentioned him? orthdox can't be too far down the pecking order now that we're apparently picking spinners based on club performances, anyway.
__________________
"Under the spreading chestnut tree,
I sold you and you sold me."
Adamc is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:55 AM   #37 (permalink)
RTDAS
 
pasag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Looking for milksteak
Posts: 31,679
Might start picking people based on dev league form.
__________________
Rest In Peace Craigos
2003-2012
pasag is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:56 AM   #38 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
andyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 23,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noble One View Post
The mismanagement of Australian spinners by the selectors has been truly poor. The selectors are not at fault for the quality of bowlers on the circuit, but some logic in selections would be fantastic.

Looking back to Bangladesh in 2006 when the selectors made the good call of selecting Dan Cullen. That was a forward thinking move, Cullen was coming off a massive 43 first class wicket season and looked a supreme talent. The selectors simply cut him off after the one Test he played. How about keeping him around the ODI setup? Four years later, and Cullen almost looks stamped as 'career over' at the age of 26.

The selection of Beau Casson at the time was questionable, and yet considering what has happened in the past month would pass as a good move today. They give Casson one Test match, he actually bowls quite well, and then they never select him again. Casson suffers from a complete loss of confidence and will now likely make the NSW team more for his batting than his bowling. At 28, another career looks destroyed.

They take White to India as the number one spinner. This is despite the fact that White has almost completely ceased bowling his leg-breaks. Is it a shock that White struggles to take a wicket?

Selecting Krejza was a brave move considering he had done little in his first class career other than show the ability to bowl a massive off-break. In a surprise twist, Krejza bowls out of his skin in India. They bring him back to Australia, and discard him after one Test. Surely he was worth persisting with?

McGain should have been persisted with for more than 1 Test. It was a terrible performance by him, but considering they gave North > 20 Tests to prove himself a failure, how about give the only consistent spinner in this country of the past 5 years more of a chance.

They select the completely underserving Hauritz and he proves to be a solid Test spinner. Discarded after one poor series in India (despite returning from a massive layoff). They select the promising Smith, he does better than many expected, and then the selectors have hardly shown interest again until today. They select the proven first class failure in Doherty based on 1 good first class game, and 2 good ODI games. It’s funny how the bowler with a first class average of 50 struggles to take a wicket at Test level.. Let's not forget they took Holland to India two seasons ago for the experience, and then never take a look at him again. They take O'Keefe to England, they select him for Australia 'A' and now don't want to touch him.

....and Michael Beer...WTF???????? I worry that Chris Simpson might return for Queensland and take three wickets and be selected for Australia. What is going on at the moment?
Love this post to bits, agree totally. So nonsensical.

Also enjoyed this article. Like Adamc just brought up, and the article mentions, I'm positive that had Warne not mentioned Beer (and I doubt it was much more than a throwaway sentence in his column), the bloke wouldn't be this close to his Test debut.
__________________
Celebrating the defining moments of CW:
Quote:
Jono: And no one likes your idea because its ****ty American poo.
Nnanden: Same, but that's because Andy OWNS MY SOUL
silentstriker: I'll start fishing for compliments when I can see all of my junk when I look down.
JMAS- What a guy
Have you been tested?

In memory of Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW
andyc is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:57 AM   #39 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Xuhaib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Karachi
Posts: 9,394
meh just another strategy to avoid coming to Pakistan.
Xuhaib is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:57 AM   #40 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
andyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 23,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by pasag View Post
Might start picking people based on dev league form.


Best thing to come out of this so far.

Edit: And Xuhaib's one above.

Last edited by andyc; 10-12-2010 at 05:58 AM.
andyc is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 06:01 AM   #41 (permalink)
International Coach
 
GotSpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stranger leering through a pair of binoculars
Posts: 12,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyc View Post
Love this post to bits, agree totally. So nonsensical.

Also enjoyed this article. Like Adamc just brought up, and the article mentions, I'm positive that had Warne not mentioned Beer (and I doubt it was much more than a throwaway sentence in his column), the bloke wouldn't be this close to his Test debut.
It's amazing how much the words of Warne influence the selectors.
__________________
Mark Waugh
Quote:
"He's [Michael Clarke] on Twitter saying sorry for not walking? Mate if he did that in our side there'd be hell to play. AB would chuck his Twitter box off the balcony or whatever it is. Sorry for not walking? Jesus Christ man."
RIP Craigos
GotSpin is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 06:02 AM   #42 (permalink)
vcs
International Coach
 
vcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 10,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noble One View Post
The mismanagement of Australian spinners by the selectors has been truly poor. The selectors are not at fault for the quality of bowlers on the circuit, but some logic in selections would be fantastic.

Looking back to Bangladesh in 2006 when the selectors made the good call of selecting Dan Cullen. That was a forward thinking move, Cullen was coming off a massive 43 first class wicket season and looked a supreme talent. The selectors simply cut him off after the one Test he played. How about keeping him around the ODI setup? Four years later, and Cullen almost looks stamped as 'career over' at the age of 26.

The selection of Beau Casson at the time was questionable, and yet considering what has happened in the past month would pass as a good move today. They give Casson one Test match, he actually bowls quite well, and then they never select him again. Casson suffers from a complete loss of confidence and will now likely make the NSW team more for his batting than his bowling. At 28, another career looks destroyed.

They take White to India as the number one spinner. This is despite the fact that White has almost completely ceased bowling his leg-breaks. Is it a shock that White struggles to take a wicket?

Selecting Krejza was a brave move considering he had done little in his first class career other than show the ability to bowl a massive off-break. In a surprise twist, Krejza bowls out of his skin in India. They bring him back to Australia, and discard him after one Test. Surely he was worth persisting with?

McGain should have been persisted with for more than 1 Test. It was a terrible performance by him, but considering they gave North > 20 Tests to prove himself a failure, how about give the only consistent spinner in this country of the past 5 years more of a chance.

They select the completely underserving Hauritz and he proves to be a solid Test spinner. Discarded after one poor series in India (despite returning from a massive layoff). They select the promising Smith, he does better than many expected, and then the selectors have hardly shown interest again until today. They select the proven first class failure in Doherty based on 1 good first class game, and 2 good ODI games. It’s funny how the bowler with a first class average of 50 struggles to take a wicket at Test level.. Let's not forget they took Holland to India two seasons ago for the experience, and then never take a look at him again. They take O'Keefe to England, they select him for Australia 'A' and now don't want to touch him.

....and Michael Beer...WTF???????? I worry that Chris Simpson might return for Queensland and take three wickets and be selected for Australia. What is going on at the moment?
That is shocking, "Indian pacer wheel of mediocrity" type stuff. I always wonder how bowlers like Brad Hogg, Bracken and Tait come out for Australia and suddenly look world-class in a World Cup but completely fail in the Test arena. Brad Hogg was fantastic in the '07 WC, nobody was able to pick up his googly.
vcs is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 06:03 AM   #43 (permalink)
International Coach
 
GotSpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stranger leering through a pair of binoculars
Posts: 12,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by vcs View Post
That is shocking, "Indian pacer wheel of mediocrity" type stuff. I always wonder how bowlers like Brad Hogg, Bracken and Tait come out for Australia and suddenly look world-class in a World Cup but completely fail in the Test arena. Brad Hogg was fantastic in the '07 WC, nobody was able to pick up his googly.
Calling our spinners mediocre is very much a compliment.
GotSpin is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 09:15 AM   #44 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator
 
Neil Pickup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 26,361
One of my colleagues mentioned this selection to me at lunch today and I couldn't stop laughing for the next minute. It took some explaining to random boarders.

Panic stations much?
__________________
MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog
Neil Pickup is offline  
Old 10-12-2010, 09:30 AM   #45 (permalink)
U19 Debutant
 
joels344's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: America
Posts: 317
I've never seen Beer bowl, so I cannot fully criticize him, yet. That being said, just looking at his First-class numbers alone, he's not very impressive at all. Only 5 FC matches, not even a 4 wicket haul, an average of almost 40, an economy rate above 3.50, and he's already getting a baggy green? That's just ridiculous.
joels344 is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Michael Jackson dies Lillian Thomson Off Topic 296 08-11-2011 08:37 AM
Michael Vaughan- Jekyll and Hyde? GuyFromLancs Cricket Chat 99 07-02-2010 06:41 PM
Mystery Draft V.2 (1989-2009) Mupariwa_Magic Cricket Chat 492 21-11-2009 01:00 PM
Michael Hussey – Is his time up? Jakester1288 Cricket Chat 222 27-08-2009 03:28 AM
Michael Clarke possibly out of the 4th test? Shri Ashes 2009 20 07-08-2009 02:26 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web