Originally Posted by CricinfoOriginally Posted by Cricinfo
Think Kumble's 5/84 (and maybe his 8/141), and Vettori's 6/87 are "better" than Swann's 5/91.
Missed the 6fers somehow; was the 5/91 I was looking at.
Still, decent nonetheless.
Kumble was absolutely sensational in 2003-04. Given the form and class of the Aussie batting lineup at the time, and the support (or the lack of it) that he had, it was an incredible effort.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)