You know, there's a reason I only gave three options. If it's an open-ended question the answer is Warne. No debate.
Shane Warne or Glen McGrath. If we had either we would have won.
Given Symond's recent form I think in all likelihood he would have done a grand total of absolutely nothing.
Last edited by Son Of Coco; 27-08-2009 at 11:45 PM.
"What is this what is this who is this guy shouting what is this going on in here?" - CP. (re: psxpro)
R.I.P Craigos, you were a champion bloke. One of the best
R.I.P Fardin 'Bob' Qayyumi
Member of the Church of the Holy Glenn McGrath
"How about you do something contstructive in this forum for once and not fill the forum with ****. You offer nothing." - theegyptian.
"There's more chance of SoC making a good post than Smith averaging 99.95." - Furball
none of them
I thought Aus played really good.. first test they almost won.. second test they were defy by Strauss.. third test was drawn due to bad weather when Aus was clearly on top.. fourth test they domanated England.. 5th test.. they had what pakistan does the best.. a big collaps ..
i voted for Gilly.. anyways.. i think North was a better substitute for Symonds.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"People make me happy.. not places.. people"
"When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)