This is making me a bit pissed off actually, why are number 7 and 8 putting on our only decent partnership? FFS. Good to watch though.
My prediction is coming true
We've seemingly forgotten the part where we bowled on a good length and straight around off-stump in the first innings.
At least we've got Clark to come on and keep it tight...
"What is this what is this who is this guy shouting what is this going on in here?" - CP. (re: psxpro)
R.I.P Craigos, you were a champion bloke. One of the best
R.I.P Fardin 'Bob' Qayyumi
Member of the Church of the Holy Glenn McGrath
"How about you do something contstructive in this forum for once and not fill the forum with ****. You offer nothing." - theegyptian.
Fans chanting 'easy'
Refunds will be avoided if we bat a little longer. TBH I didn't think you got a refund if the low number of overs was due to a result being achieved, but they said before play the crowd would get their money back if we batted less than 25 overs. Not sure how many have been bowled, must be around 20 though.
I maintain there's nothing better in cricket than a wagging tail. Always good fun.
Heads, Shoulders, Knees, John Stones
49 runs off 3 overs
Come on you two, another 138, save my avatar
That was like watching Pietersen bat.
I agree with Beefy. Get these in the middle order.
**** you, Swann and Broad. I'm meant to be working on a presentation I have to do in just over 12 hours, but I can't look away from the TV.
Partnership of 90 off 67 balls
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)