• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Women's Ashes (+ One Day Series)

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
Probably best to put it here.

Australia had a good win in the Twenty20, but England bounced back with a 9 wicket win yesterday in the first ODI

2nd ODI today and England scored 259, Australia are 7-1 in the 4th. Tough chase.

3 more ODI's to go and then the test.

Sarah Taylor is gun...60 odd yesterday and a ton today.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Still find it a bit disappointing that they don't play a two-Test series (three would be asking too much) TBH.
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Still find it a bit disappointing that they don't play a two-Test series (three would be asking too much) TBH.
Three would not be asking too much. If you want a series and to have it taken seriously, three is the bare minimum. Sure, I don't expect every series of theirs to be 3 matches, but for the Ashes - come on.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
The point is, I'd like it to be three, but the chances of that are precisely zero.

When was the last time a three-Test series - Ashes or otherwise - was played?
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
How many did they play in 2005? Was it two?

I don't see why the chances are precisely zero. Zero at the moment, maybe, but in the future they will have to play more fixtures.

Two should be the bare minimum. One does not a series make.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
No - a one-off Test makes... well, a one-off Test. :mellow: And it's mad that The Women's Ashes should be at stake based on a one-off Test.

As for the zero chance, well, there's never any ability to know what's a possibility in the future. Right now, though, if you're expecting more than two you're going to be disappointed - and sometimes (as the last two series' demonstrate) you're not even going to get that. Yes, I'm almost certain it was a two-Test rubber in 2005, the one before that.
 

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
was a 3 test series in 98 iirc. Ended 0-0...think the high proportion of slow scoring draws may have led to the cut back in the number of games, might be possible to go back up again now as the standard is higher

Played a 5 test series in 84/85 in Aus
 
Last edited:

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
England won by 2 wickets on the last ball in the previous game as well...good pressure play. and yeah Laura Marsh
 

Dydl

International Debutant
Hopefully this weather not a taste of things to come, though am very prepared to be disappointed in that regard.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Hopefully this weather not a taste of things to come, though am very prepared to be disappointed in that regard.
Apparently July is scheduled to be indifferent and very episodic (has been so far) and August once again constantly sunny.
 

four_or_six

Cricketer Of The Year
23/4, excellent start from our girls. Going to be hard for the Aussies to win from here, especially with all the top four gone.
 

Dydl

International Debutant
28/5... meltdown.
Yeah, dismal. Very impressive captain's innings from Fields here, and Haynes on debut. Ridiculous top order peformance. 11 fours so far for Fields in her 70. Not bad. But still in a pretty bad position...
 

Top