Nah, I've just been wanting a b****-slapping from Matt for a fair while, truth be told.
BTW, less of the Richo-ing from you. You're not the idiot Camel56 types (and you'll actually remember 'em).
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourthcricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
Looks like I'm the latest victim
there's a few hilfy haters areound here, i fully rate him, but yes, raw, swings it at good pace, accurate, goes in hard all day, but he is only 2 tests in, siddle looked a little raw after 2 tests as well.
he needs to do a little more when the ball gets old i feel.
i'd also like to see a little more of bollinger, he's been running through state batsmen for years.
and to clarify, lee probably should have been the best bowler in the world at some point in time, but wasn't, and i don't count a handful of good tests as putting him in the upper echelon, that was probably simply what he should have been doing all along. on that basis paul reiffel was the best bowler in the world in '93
Personally though I agree with him in this instance: Bollinger is significantly better than Hilf.
Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Rejecting 'selection deontology' since Mar '15
'Stats' is not a synonym for 'Career Test Averages'
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Tucker
Bollinger love fest on this board.
ns hey, change the url to cricketwebsydney.net/forum
but bollinger is from sydney so the theory can still stand, but he's bald and doesn't have blonde hair, not even the advanced hair hat was blonde, someone should have told him
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)