SixthTest anyone? - Page 4

The Baconator · 20-01-2007, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhoenixFire

I can absolutley guarantee that if you lot played against some of the ****ty school sides that I do, then you would score runs.

Thing with me isn't the dire opponents, usually only have 20 overs.

PhoenixFire · 20-01-2007, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Baconator

Thing with me isn't the dire opponents, usually only have 20 overs.

I've score 101* in a 20 over match, against a totally dire side, whose idea of a length ball was a long-hop, just ****e really.

Richard · 20-01-2007, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhoenixFire

Your that bad Dickinson?

You'd have to see my record to realise how bad I am.

And I haven't kept a close look because most of it reads pretty similar.. gets boring looking at 0, 1 and 2 over and again...

Seriously, I can't even remember when the last time I hit a boundary was... think I might possibly have hit 1 last season, though I only batted about 4 or 5 times.

I don't think I've made double-figures since 2004.

LongHopCassidy · 24-01-2007, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoyBrumby

So are you the scarecrow, the tinman, the cowardly lion or Dorothy?

Langeveldt · 24-01-2007, 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by howardj

What about a 7th Test in Canberra? Seriously though, I think five is sufficient.

Haha no way, would we want to see England beaten 7-0?

Richard · 24-01-2007, 07:55 AM

Nope.

But it'd be even more unlikely than 5-0 was.

Poker Boy · 24-01-2007, 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard

Nope.

But it'd be even more unlikely than 5-0 was.

I don't know - with the rubbish we produced in this winter's Ashes series I reckon if there had been ten tests we'd have lost 10-0!

Langeveldt · 24-01-2007, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poker Boy

I don't know - with the rubbish we produced in this winter's Ashes series I reckon if there had been ten tests we'd have lost 10-0!

Yeah, and if it was a one day series it'd be 20-0

Richard · 24-01-2007, 09:33 AM

Well I'm amazed we managed to beat NZ so but for that it could conceivably have been 8-0 at least... and if Liam is to be believed we could add that to the Tests and Twenty20 to make 16-0.

As for losing 7-0 or 10-0... I'm confident some sort of freakish thing would've happened somewhere along some line or other to save us at some point if we'd played enough games.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

24-01-2007, 07:55 AM	#51 (permalink)
Richard Cricket Web Staff Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 2005 Posts: 80,407	Nope. But it'd be even more unlikely than 5-0 was.

24-01-2007, 09:33 AM	#54 (permalink)
Richard Cricket Web Staff Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 2005 Posts: 80,407	Well I'm amazed we managed to beat NZ so but for that it could conceivably have been 8-0 at least... and if Liam is to be believed we could add that to the Tests and Twenty20 to make 16-0. As for losing 7-0 or 10-0... I'm confident some sort of freakish thing would've happened somewhere along some line or other to save us at some point if we'd played enough games.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)