• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

After the Whitewash (or How to Lose the Ashes)

Neil Pickup

Cricket Web Moderator
These are the fruits of a train journey between Cleethorpes and approximately Rotherham.

Feedback appreciated.
 
Last edited:

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Great article.

I'd rather have four bowlers, including the all rounder and six top order batsman. If one of the six can send down a few overs, thats good enough. If not, thats still good enough. The depth of English batting would be exceptional if they batted with Flintoff coming in at seven and a keeper at eight. Flintoff would make them the deepest batting lineup in the world. Just look at how much it has helped SA out this series with such vital knocks by Pollock.

Four bowlers, assuming all are fit and have match perparation, ought to be enough. But with Flintoff not at full speed and injury concerns with some of the others...I realize it may not be possible.
 
Last edited:

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
If Jones gets fully fit and FLintoff is better with his ankle, how about Flintoff-Jones-Panesar-Hoggard? Or you can even go with four quicks at Flintoff-Jones-Hoggard-Harmison.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Top stuff as always. You'd be a huge loss to the fourth estate if you end up a humble pedagogue. :)

WRT to the four/five bowlers debate I'm still firmly in the five bowlers camp if we have five bowlers worthy of the name. Yes, it'd be nice to have a batter who sent down a few overs or a bowler who could bat, but where are these players in our county scene? We're in serious danger of falling into the "bits-and-pieces" trap again.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Good piece, showing admirable restraint. Nothing unfair or exaggerated that I could spot.

The only thing I'd add is the complacency that's been present for most of the last 15 months, evident the charge of the ****e brigade at Multan, the "lets not bother with a decent night sleep before playing pakistan so we can wallow in the ashes with the Beeb" episode, the staggering slopiness in all 3 tests against SL, Fred's view that he can publicly refer to our elected PM as a "knob", pretty much every utterance from Steve Harmison this year and, as you mentioned, the idea that we could take on the best in the world after about a week & a half in their neck of the woods. They had this coming big time, and you can only hope that lessons will be learnt, acted on, and not repeated in our lifetimes. Cue pigs flying ....
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Top stuff as always. You'd be a huge loss to the fourth estate if you end up a humble pedagogue. :)

WRT to the four/five bowlers debate I'm still firmly in the five bowlers camp if we have five bowlers worthy of the name. Yes, it'd be nice to have a batter who sent down a few overs or a bowler who could bat, but where are these players in our county scene? We're in serious danger of falling into the "bits-and-pieces" trap again.
But then you have a huge tail. Giles wasn't doing any good but you still need to be able to bat down to #8 with #8 at least able to rotate the strike and stay around for a while. Flintoff gives England the shot to field the deepest batting lineup, even more than the one SA has. And SA has been killing us with that deep lineup this series...its vital IMO.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
But then you have a huge tail. Giles wasn't doing any good but you still need to be able to bat down to #8 with #8 at least able to rotate the strike and stay around for a while. Flintoff gives England the shot to field the deepest batting lineup, even more than the one SA has. And SA has been killing us with that deep lineup this series...its vital IMO.
Five bowlers is my ideal, it isn't always appropriate for every test. It isn't desirable to have such a long tail as we do currently, obviously. Which comes back to my point about bowlers being "worthy of the name". Saj may've batted like a drain, but if he'd taken a five-for the game would've looked very different. I actually would've played Dalrymple (almost the dictionary definition of bits-and-pieces) for the fifth test, simply because it's very obvious Flintoff doesn't rate Saj at all and Jamie was more likely to score some runs than Saj or Read.

Fred is the key for balance, obviously. Before he came along we could fudge the issue with Alec Stewart doning the gloves, but now with Fred very much a bowling all-rounder & neither of our keepers looking remotely close to being up to it with the bat, our batting depth is too shallow. Food for thought: we were 234-4 at the end of day one & ended up 291 all out; Oz were 188-4 after day two & finished up 102 runs ahead.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Excellent article Neil, very well written and a pleasure to read.
 

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
Top stuff as always. You'd be a huge loss to the fourth estate if you end up a humble pedagogue. :)

WRT to the four/five bowlers debate I'm still firmly in the five bowlers camp if we have five bowlers worthy of the name. Yes, it'd be nice to have a batter who sent down a few overs or a bowler who could bat, but where are these players in our county scene? We're in serious danger of falling into the "bits-and-pieces" trap again.
Corky :p

Seriously the possible next generation(Broad, Smith, Rashid) are at lot more handy with the bat than the current bowlers
 

Slow Love™

International Captain
Nice stuff, Neil. Don't think the disclaimers at the end were necessary though. :)

Couldn't believe Fletcher's over-candid comments today/yesterday regarding his uncertainty about replacing Strauss with Flintoff as captain (well then don't go and do it, man!) and Freddie's difficulties with Harmison's crap attitude. It really is almost like a parody.
 

PY

International Coach
Very readable article.

Send Saj and Jimmy back to country cricket to try bowl more than a hundred overs in a season. Some terrible statistics looking at the overs bowled by the younger chaps. Shane Warne bowled, during this series, one quarter of the overs that Mahmood has bowled in his entire FC career.

One thing I'd definitely like to see before 2009 is England's players being released to play more country cricket before series start as you mention Neil, or even during the series if the player needs overs (like England's cronically did) or time at the crease.

Freddie should have the captaincy ripped off him, and get him fit for goodness sake. If we play five batsmen, he needs to be able to hold a bat the right way and he hasn't this series. I think I'd take 4 bowlers at the moment. Panesar, Hoggy, Flintoff and ______ depending on Jones. I'd get shot of Harmison, his attitude stinks and his performances don't smell much sweeter.

One thing is for certain, someone needs to be teaching our potential bowlers how to hold a friggin' cricket bat because none of them can at the moment and we can't have four absolute Duracells at 8-11.
 

Top