Cricket Web

Cricket Web (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/)
-   Ashes 2006/07 (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/ashes-2006-07/)
-   -   The worst Australian team for years? (http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/ashes-2006-07/21550-worst-australian-team-years.html)

Lillian Thomson 29-12-2006 01:09 PM

The worst Australian team for years?
 
Langer and Hayden - both past their peak and not as consistant as in previous years
Ponting - probably the only member of the team at the peak of his form.
Hussey - First Ashes series
Clarke - Not established in the side
Symonds - unlikely to be a long term Test player dispite his recent century
Gilchrist - One great innings but another one past his peak
Warne - A freak, probably still be at his peak when he's 90 if he wanted to continue playing
Clarke - Top wicket taker, but 31 years old before getting a run in the side.
Lee - Inconsistant as always
McGrath - Obviously well past his prime and not needed in this series to produce a match winning performance.

:unsure: :unsure: :unsure: :unsure: :unsure:

Matteh 29-12-2006 01:18 PM

What a peculiar line of reasoning.

wpdavid 29-12-2006 01:24 PM

Well, it's better than the 2005 XI, if only because of Hussey & Clark.
It's not as good as the sides in the late 90's/early 2000's. Maybe on a par with the mid90's side with guys like Merv Hughes, Brendan Julian & Paul Reiffel? Beyond that, I'd reckon that Warne makes them superior to the Aus side in the early 90's.

Over the last 30 years or so:

1. Late 90's/early 2000's
2. Mid 70's
3= Current side & mid 90's
4= Late 70's & early 90's

silentstriker 29-12-2006 01:26 PM

Nah, I don't think so.

Lillian Thomson 29-12-2006 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silentstriker
Nah, I don't think so.


You must stop this sort of in-depth analysis or people will start to think you like Britney Spears.

PhoenixFire 29-12-2006 01:42 PM

I agree on most parts, Hussey is a legend, Hayden looks good, and so does Clarke.

silentstriker 29-12-2006 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lillian Thomson
You must stop this sort of in-depth analysis or people will start to think you like Britney Spears.

Well, their bowling coming through is good (Johnson, still have MacGill, Clark). Their batting is phenomenal, with some new guys coming in that should be good (Jaques, Hussey).

I don't see a big decline.

steds 29-12-2006 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lillian Thomson
You must stop this sort of in-depth analysis or people will start to think you like Britney Spears.

:laugh:

Turbinator 29-12-2006 01:52 PM

I don't think it was Australia's greatness that really won them this series, it was more so the determination and willingness regain the Ashes and obviously England's lacklustre performances.

AussieDominance 29-12-2006 01:53 PM

Use Stats Spider :p

James90 29-12-2006 05:05 PM

Is this some sort of sick joke?

howardj 29-12-2006 05:07 PM

If it's the worst, I'd hate to lose 4-0 to it. :p

sideshowtim 29-12-2006 06:45 PM

Yeah, gee, what a horible team...17 consecutive undefeated test matches...Leading the second best team in the world 4-0... Worst team ever for sure.

luffy 29-12-2006 07:54 PM

Totally crap imo. Hate to be England at the moment if Australia are being called crap England must be playing worse than USA.

Nnanden 29-12-2006 09:10 PM

Australia = Bangladesh really. Can beat Zimbabwe most of the time, but everything else is a huge struggle. Give them time people, were New Zealand any good when they first started? It`ll take years, but I can see them being competitive will Test playing nations in the not too distant future.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web