![]() |
England - rated out of 10 so far
Strauss - 3 - Would have been lower but he's had three bad decisions.
Cook - 6 - Just getting going and will probably be higher after the 5th Test Bell - 7- Almost proving his class but playing too many half innings and getting out. Collingwood - 8 - Two good Tests but doubtful whether he'll reproduce that form. Pietersen - 9 - Top man. Flintoff - 6 - Looked our best bowler but poor batting and iffy selection and captaincy. Jones - 5 - Keeping has been bordering on adequate but hasn't scored the runs to justify his selection. Giles - 1 - Hardly played any cricket in the past year and shouldn't have been on this tour. Hoggard - 7 - Bowled well at times. Harmeson - 5 - Started off crap and has improved to erratic. Anderson - 4 - Another one who's hardly played in the past year, but bowled quite well at times. Panesar - 8 - Stating the blindingly obvious to say he should have played from the start. Mahmood - 1 - Was he playing..............someone should have pointed this out to the captain. |
Pretty fair ratings tbh
|
Anderson a 4 and Giles a 1? Thought they were more or less equal in the first two tests.
|
Would have most of mine lower tbh. Harmison and Anderson especially.
|
Yeah can't see how Anderson got past 1, and Harmison is a 3.5 at most for me.
|
For me:
Collingwood - 7 Pietersen - 7 Hoggard - 7 Bell - 6 Panesar - 6 Flintoff - 5.5 Cook - 5 Harmeson - 4 Jones - 3 Giles - 3 Anderson - 3 Mahmood - N/A |
Strauss - 4
Collingwood - 7 Pietersen - 8 Hoggard - 7 Bell - 6 Flintoff - 4 Cook - 6 Harmison - 3 Jones - 3 Giles - 2 Anderson - 1 Panesar - 7 Mahmood - 0.5 Flintoff really hasn`t done much at all IMO. |
Quote:
|
Strauss - 3
Cook - 5 Bell - 7 Collingwood - 8 Pietersen - 9 Flintoff - 5 Jones - 4 Giles - 2 Hoggard - 6 Harmison - 4 Anderson - 3 Panesar - 8 Mahmood - 3 |
Mahmood 3?
|
Can't quite remember what my thinking was, but I had a reason.
|
Quote:
|
I thought Jones has been sound enough with the gloves this tour, he's just been utterly dire with the bat.
|
Strauss - 4, played well when he didn't get a crap desicion
Cook - 6, has played really well for a 21 year old, and scored a good hundred Bell - 5, not had the best of tours, but had a good innings at the WACA Collingwood - 8, one of our best batsmen, just didn't get in at the WACA Pietersen - 9, best batter by a distance, played as well as I have ever seen him Flintoff - 5, feel for the man, but not had the best performances Jones - 4, batted like crap, kept fantastically Giles - 2, fairly awful tour, bowled crap and batted very average Mahmood - 3, did he play? Hoggard - 8, our best bowler, tried the hardest out of any of them Harmison - 4, found his feet and bowled great at the WACA after a shocking start Panesar - 8, made the most of his limited opurtunities, and batted great |
Mahmood - 0, how many wickets he took
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web