• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Andrew Flintoff as a leader of men

Langeveldt

Soutie
Okay his quality is not doubted, but what most worries me about the recent Ashes performances is his inability to criticize during his interviews..

He may be a really happy chap and a pleasure to play for, but bleating on about the "positives" when you have smacked 500+ and still been hammered leaves a little bit to be desired.. Maybe he would be more effective if he concentrated on kicking some ass rather than trying not to demoralise any of his players..
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
To be fair, I don't really think it matters what he says in public, what matters really is what he says to his troops in the camp.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
Too much of a nice guy I think. I can't imagine him ever delivering a rocket up anyone's backside if necessary. For example, KP really need a word or two after stupidly giving away those overthrows, but all Fred did was stand there looking annoyed.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
Barney Rubble said:
Too much of a nice guy I think. I can't imagine him ever delivering a rocket up anyone's backside if necessary. For example, KP really need a word or two after stupidly giving away those overthrows, but all Fred did was stand there looking annoyed.
That look said a 1000 words :laugh:
 
He captained poorly.

Let that Warne, Clarke partnership build by continuously bowling Giles over the wicket to Warne and getting milked for easy singles. Didn't change anything, wasn't proactive.

What a joke, so they were admitting they didn't think they were capable of getting a tail endering slogger out. Giles is such an embarrassment.

I have no doubt that Warne wouln't have been able to resist from around, but they didn't even try it.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
It was his tactics in the second innings that were more baffling. He spread the field from the first ball and allowed them to pick up singles at their leisure. England's only chance was to take early wickets and make Australia re-assess their ambitions. He should have started with an orthodox field with the new ball.
 

steds

Hall of Fame Member
For someone who supposedly got the job partly because he could "get the best out of Harmison", he does a bloody good job of convincing me he doesn't trust the rest of his bowling attack (hence him ending up bowling excessively like vs. Sri Lanka).
 
Looking back, nother thing I found hilarious is that after the first test when asked whether he would keep Harmisson opening the bowling or himself, he firmly replied, no no I am a first change bowler and we have guys who are better suited to doing that job.

Yeah OK. So that'll be Flintoff opening in both innings and at the beginning of the day then. :laugh:
 

Gottaluvcricket

Cricket Spectator
No doubting Flintoff's talent as a player. Too nice a guy to be a leader. Harmison is a professional player, is he not? Instead of treating him like an under 12 player and patting him on the back for getting one on the pitch, maybe a kick in the butt and told to do his job would have some better results. Treat him like a man, not a baby.
You think being tough as a leader brings bad results? Ian Chappel wasn't soft, Steve Waugh, ect ect.
The better teams have always been led by a strong leader, not just a good mate.
Those KP overthows is a prime example. KP was clearly going to do that before it happened, the commentaters mentioned it, you could see it on TV, he threw a few wildly before that one finally went astray. A captians word before that would've stopped it before it happened. An unfriendly look after the fact. :laugh: I wish he was my boss.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Langeveldt said:
Okay his quality is not doubted, but what most worries me about the recent Ashes performances is his inability to criticize during his interviews..

He may be a really happy chap and a pleasure to play for, but bleating on about the "positives" when you have smacked 500+ and still been hammered leaves a little bit to be desired.. Maybe he would be more effective if he concentrated on kicking some ass rather than trying not to demoralise any of his players..
tbf interviews aren't the place to do that. Neither is the field of play the place to offer major bollockings. Criticism should be a private affair, and we don't really know what goes on behind the scenes. Like you, I get the impression he's not up to that part of the job though, but it's gueswork on our part. There's enough other reasons why I don't think he should be captain anyway.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
He's clearly losing the respect and/or faith of at least some of the players - Saj Mahmood's public criticism of him today must have stung, especially from one of his county teammates. Don't think he's up to the job. Give it to Strauss ASAP.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
Strauss should have had it from the start. He has a better tactical knowhow, seems to be more articulate, doesn't have to cope with bowling as well, and seems to be a much cooler and calmer bloke than Fred. Bollocks to the motivational crap, if players can't motivate themselves to play for their country, then they have a big problem.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
PhoenixFire said:
Strauss should have had it from the start. He has a better tactical knowhow, seems to be more articulate, doesn't have to cope with bowling as well, and seems to be a much cooler and calmer bloke than Fred. Bollocks to the motivational crap, if players can't motivate themselves to play for their country, then they have a big problem.
Exactly right. No man with three wins in four Tests deserves to be unceremoniously turfed back into the ranks like that.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
The whole 5-0 (Sri Lanka ODI series) argument is totally invalid. Not only was he given **** players like Tim Bresnan to work with, the players that were supposedly 'senior' and 'expirienced', played just as bad.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
PhoenixFire said:
The whole 5-0 (Sri Lanka ODI series) argument is totally invalid. Not only was he given **** players like Tim Bresnan to work with, the players that were supposedly 'senior' and 'expirienced', played just as bad.
Exactly right once again. It's not like he made any bad decisions. He just didn't have any good options available to choose.
 

Neil Pickup

Cricket Web Moderator
I remember some interesting decisions based on powerplays and Saj. Can't remember the exactitudes.

I can't remember who said it, but a phrase to the effect of "why do people think that a public school and university education makes a good captain..." was used by someone somewhere.

I didn't pay much attention to that series.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Neil Pickup said:
I remember some interesting decisions based on powerplays and Saj. Can't remember the exactitudes.

I can't remember who said it, but a phrase to the effect of "why do people think that a public school and university education makes a good captain..." was used by someone somewhere.

I didn't pay much attention to that series.
Never did Brearley or Jardine any harm.
 

Barney Rubble

International Coach
Neil Pickup said:
I remember some interesting decisions based on powerplays and Saj. Can't remember the exactitudes.

I can't remember who said it, but a phrase to the effect of "why do people think that a public school and university education makes a good captain..." was used by someone somewhere.

I didn't pay much attention to that series.
At the end of the day he won three out of four, with what in theory should have been a weakened XI compared to the one we currently have available, and against a good side. I just don't see the logic in fixing something that ain't that broke.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
PhoenixFire said:
Strauss should have had it from the start. He has a better tactical knowhow, seems to be more articulate, doesn't have to cope with bowling as well, and seems to be a much cooler and calmer bloke than Fred. Bollocks to the motivational crap, if players can't motivate themselves to play for their country, then they have a big problem.
But its not as id Strauss is in roaring form either. What has he done this series? Except get out because he doesn't like using his bat. I don't think you can give captaincy to an out of form player. He would already be preoccupied with correcting his personal form, to worry about other things.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
Flintoff is a lot more out of form than Strauss is.

I don't really think Strauss is that badly out of form anyway, he's been unlucky with some decisions, and had poor shot selection, but not out of form.
 

Top