• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

4th Australian Bowler for 1st Test

Who should be the 4th bowler

  • Staurt MacGill

    Votes: 12 31.6%

  • Nathan Bracken

    Votes: 3 7.9%

  • Staurt Clark

    Votes: 3 7.9%

  • Mitchell Johnson

    Votes: 12 31.6%

  • Jason Gillespe

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Shaun Tait

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Shane Watson

    Votes: 2 5.3%

  • Mike Lewis

    Votes: 6 15.8%
  • Total voters
    38
  • Poll closed .
FaaipDeOiad

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
He'll have another game against them to make his case, but I don't see how he can be picked based on that. It was a fine performance, but it was a one day game, and England's first outing for the series. He'd need to back it up with a haul of wickets in the FC game for South Australia and have Clark and Johnson struggle to get a spot.
 
GIMH

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
shortpitched713 said:
I'd go with Johnson, but I'd give MacGill a go in at least Sydney, if not also other venues.

Part of the reason is because I wouldn't pick Watson because I think he's rubbish. :p
Click to expand...
Is it just me who found this hilarious?
 
Matt79

Matt79

Global Moderator
FaaipDeOiad said:
He'll have another game against them to make his case, but I don't see how he can be picked based on that. It was a fine performance, but it was a one day game, and England's first outing for the series. He'd need to back it up with a haul of wickets in the FC game for South Australia and have Clark and Johnson struggle to get a spot.
Click to expand...
True enough. I think this performance has got him right back in the frame, and if he has another good game for SA, they should go with him.

I'd like to see Tait brought on to bowl whenever Flintoff arrives at the crease. He beat him so comprehensively today, and its the sort of pressure point you just have to keep kneeling on as hard as you can until you get that satisfying "crack"...
 
FaaipDeOiad

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Matt79 said:
True enough. I think this performance has got him right back in the frame, and if he has another good game for SA, they should go with him.

I'd like to see Tait brought on to bowl whenever Flintoff arrives at the crease. He beat him so comprehensively today, and its the sort of pressure point you just have to keep kneeling on as hard as you can until you get that satisfying "crack"...
Click to expand...
As I said in the other thread, Johnson and Clark are coming off very good performances too, and the fact that this one was in Australia, on TV and against England shouldn't necessarily make it more important. Johnson had the best of Pietersen and took 3 wickets against them in India after all, and he was also consistent in the other matches there and took 4/11 against India in Malaysia. Clark has been in very solid form with both bat and ball since returning from his injury as well, and just recently took 6/39 in a Pura Cup game and made a half century as well.

Tait bowled well, but I don't think he's done as much to convince the selectors that he will be a reliable option in the tests as Johnson and Clark have.
 
Nate

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
It`d be foolish to pick MacGill for the first Test, and I don`t think the selectors will. Out of Johnson and Clark for mine.
 
Great Birtannia

Great Birtannia

U19 Captain
FaaipDeOiad said:
Tait bowled well, but I don't think he's done as much to convince the selectors that he will be a reliable option in the tests as Johnson and Clark have.
Click to expand...
A lot of people see Watson at #6 as a selection that allows Australia to pick MacGill but it also gives them the opportunity, if they have a reasonable level of confidence in Watson's bowling to do a job, to take a risk and select a high risk reward bowler as the third seamer with Watson to pick up the slack if it doesn't work out.

I don't think Tait has done enough to deserve selection but he has the tools to be considered strongly by the selectors. The top end series is what really hurt Tait's chances initially, Tait bowled poorly himself and Mitchell Johnson took his chance and leapfrogged him in the queue. Also, he has had a mixed start to the domestic season. He took wickets in both pura cup games against a weakened NSW, although in the first match he only really cleaned up the tail, while against the Vics he got a bit of stick and only finished with the solitary wicket IIRC.

The other thing to take into consideration is that his best and most fearful spells have come with the new ball and he is not going to get that in the Test side unless McGrath completely falls apart.
 
Great Birtannia

Great Birtannia

U19 Captain
So WA were bowled out for 208 on the "road" and Symonds was the chief destroyer with 3-18, it's a crazy world. I was listening to a bit of it on the radio early and they were saying that Johnson started off erratically before coming back to dismiss Hussey and Martyn, and then the ten and jack at the end. I think I'll just give up trying to second guess the selectors now.
 
FaaipDeOiad

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Johnson has always had the inside running IMO (since Malaysia that is), and I still expect him to play in Brisbane. One reason is the one you point out above about Tait and the new ball. Johnson has only ever had the new ball for Australia in the Bangladesh ODIs, and his best spells have come first or second change. He should get use of the ball after 10-12 overs in Brisbane if he plays, but he will not get it new, and that's going to have to be something the bowler in question can deal with.

Johnson is a risk like Tait, which is fine because hopefully Watson can do a job keeping it tight if necessary, but he's more likely to come off than Tait I think, and has got the potential to be a great bowler, perhaps even more than Tait. Clark is the safe option and could be a reasonable choice, but with McGrath and Warne both fit and ready to go I just don't feel he's necessary. He can always play later tests if Johnson doesn't come off and MacGill isn't chosen.
 
S

straightbat

Cricket Spectator
The selection of the 4th bowler will be determined by who is selected to bat at 6. If Watson is picked at 6 it gives the selectors the option of picking a Johnson or Tait knowing they have back up in Watson. I do not believe you can pick either in a 4 man attack because if Lee is erratic and the 4th bowler is too the workload will shift to McGrath and Warne, not what the Australian team will want with the schedule ahead.
Personally I would pick Watson and Johnson.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top