|11-10-2006, 04:15 AM||#1 (permalink)|
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vote 1 Tangy
Australian Conditions - The Difference?
A quick scan through the English squad shows minimal experience in Australian conditions. For the purpose of accuracy, I've excluded the ICC World XI because it wasn't a proper 'tour'.
M Trescothick 5 matches @ 26.10
S Harmison 5 matches @ 42.76
M Hoggard 3 matches @ 62.50
A Giles 1 match @ 31.83
I know they're much better players now and that was a long time ago, yadda yadda, but I thought it was worth acknowledging that they're hardly glowing statistics.
The point of this thread is to point out and provoke discussion on the topic of variables which (possibly) will play a major factor in the Ashes.
First of all, pitch conditions. In England pitches are realtively conducive to seamers, with overhead conditions aiding movement in the air and tracks are normally produced with a little bit of juice underneath the surface. In Australia, you generally find hard, fast, flat and bouncy wickets. With the possible exceptions of the SCG and the GABBA, pitches are belters to bat on, even the WACA providing good batting conditions if you adapt to the bounce.
Secondly, and a factor that I'm facinated in, the ball used. How much of a factor will the Kookaburra ball be? The Englishmen are used to bowling with the Duke pill, where the seam is exaggerated and generally provides extra help for the seamers. Will the Englishmen be able to handle it considering the flat nature of the wickets? Before anyone says, I know this won't be the first time the Englishmen have used Kookaburra balls, but nevertheless, it will be interesting.
The last point I'd point I'd like to discuss, before throwing it over to you chumps, is the issue of crowd and public expectation. IMO this is one factor that definately favours the Englishmen, as I know all of the Australian crowds will have massive expectations on the Australian outfit because we're used to overwhelming success on our home soil.
Parmi | #1 draft pick | Jake King is **** | PM me for my list of CW posters you shouldn't talk cricket with in Cricket Chat
Come and Paint Turtle
|11-10-2006, 06:20 AM||#2 (permalink)|
Join Date: Oct 2004
MacGill will have a huge series, if he gets a game. He's just born to bowl at Poms. Many on this forum would remember his 12-fer in Sydney in 1999.
|12-10-2006, 12:30 PM||#3 (permalink)|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
It's gonna be a big factor, no doubt. That said I wouldn't think all our team is totally unfamiliar with Oz conditions; Collingwood & Cook have both played grade cricket & (famously) Strauss spent 18 months in Melbourne as a nipper.
Of our seamers, only really Hoggy is (more or less) reliant on movement. Fred, Saj & Harmy will all enjoy the extra bounce.
- As featured in The Independent.
"This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers."
- Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads
|13-10-2006, 05:37 AM||#4 (permalink)|
Cricketer Of The Year
Join Date: Aug 2003
|13-10-2006, 05:49 AM||#6 (permalink)|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|The Australian Cricket future, never looked so good||MrPerko||Cricket Chat||351||08-06-2008 04:56 PM|
|Australian Squad||Simon||2006 Football World Cup - Germany||172||05-07-2006 08:49 PM|
|Bobby Simpson's Scathing Critique of Australian Cricket||howardj||Cricket Chat||21||09-10-2005 04:44 PM|
|Deal with Australian beers?||Shounak||Off Topic||37||16-09-2005 05:42 AM|
|A battle for the soul of Australian cricket||greg||Cricket Chat||29||14-09-2005 09:15 AM|