It's possible. He was bowling as well as he ever has between the tour of India and the Ashes, and if he comes back in the same vein I can't see why he wouldn't be able to play for 2-3 more years.
Hadlee played until he was 40, and they're fairly similar bowlers.
I know a place where a royal flush
Can never beat a pair
Thats true, if he drops ODI cricket after the world cup who knows, he may well & play to 40..Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
No disrespect to NZ, but you blokes have a rather deeper talent pool.Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
Obviously it's possible, but he's got a lot of miles on the clock &, even if he gives the one-dayers away, he'll have a lot more come 2009.
- As featured in The Independent.
"Predictably, the ending of his international career did not end the argument about Pietersen's merits, as an army of informed commentators and Piers Morgan weighed in to defend or attack him."
- The Guardian's Andrew Anthony
I'd like to laugh it off but you know barring serious injury...
It's not like he relies on pace...
Knowing McGrath he'll probably do it.
The health of his wife, may be the only thing that stops him.
Cricketweb Colts Captain
I'm a member of Club KerryOriginally Posted by Richard
The color of immortality, nature and envy - you are truly a unique person. While clearly the color of nature, you also symbolize rebirth, fertility and hope in the world. On the other side of the spectrum, a natural aptitude to money with green coming to signify money and possibly even *********!
yea i'd agree he is supremely fit, pretty much the fittest fast bowler i've seen other than Walsh.Originally Posted by Mister Wright
And that was yourOriginally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
post # 10000
Thats a lot of very sensible posts.
Last edited by SJS; 24-08-2006 at 09:23 PM.
Cheers.Originally Posted by SJS
No doubt, but Hadlee's performance didn't really drop off. He took 5 wickets a test at an average of 23 in his final year, though he was actually 39. Basically his only bad year was '89, when he only played 2 tests. Aside from that, he didn't average over 25 for a single year after his 30th birthday.Originally Posted by BoyBrumby
McGrath is quite fit, relies more on consistency than pace and has an easy action. If there's any guy in the world who is going to still be good enough to command a test place on his 40th birthday, it's him.
Well, maybe Murali and Warne too.
He is still bowling good but i feel he needs to stand back and let the young players get some more experienced eg Shaun Tait
McGrath is obviously just talkin himself up. He always talks **** in the media before a series. There's no reason why he couldn't do it though. Players today are a lot fitter than say 30 years ago. Cricket is their job and they train hard and maintain a high level of fitness. Back in the day they were basically amateurs. Think of how far "sports medicine" and training/fitness techniques have come. Playing to 40 these days with the knowledge we have of how to correctly train and maintain your fitness is probably the equivilant of playing till your early to mid 30's back in the day.
http://www.tormentedtheband.com - My band's website
http://www.tormentedtheband.com/musi...forumindex.htm - Free music discussion forum. CD, DVD reviews etc.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)