Err, where precisely have I said 1 single 1 of those is better than McGrath?Originally Posted by marc71178
I have said the good Vaas is better, but I've also said Vaas intersperses brilliance with some of the least penetrative stuff you'll ever see.
I've said neither Cork nor White got anywhere near achieving their potential - both are only credible as Test-standard bowlers for a short period of a year (at different times).
And Nel is only at the start of his career.
The only bowlers who I'd certainly rate above McGrath who played in his time are Donald and Ambrose. I'd rate Pollock as for-all-intents-and-purposes equal.