Originally Posted by Jono
Let's not forget Kasprowicz being a better ODI bowler than Lee.
Was i really?
Even if you were to include his last series(Despite the fact that he was clearly an inferior bowler in that series) his record from 2003 onwards is still better than Lee's record at any period of his career
Just because he and Gillespie both inexplicably lost their bowling form before the Ashes, it does not in any sense mean that i was wrong about it, because whether you like it or not, even now those sorts of performances warrant inclusion over Lee. However even during the Natwest series i had called for Lee's inclusing over Kaspa because it was quite clear that he wasnt bowling as well as he can and hes never quite been the same bowler since.