Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jnr.
Since Cricinfo already had an article up about the matter before the game had finished, they probably did not see a reason to put another one up with a few words from the other on field umpire.
|
So you think they've changed their editorial policy on just this one occasion before swiftly changing it back then?
I don't.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jnr.
A load of fabricated rubbish? As I say, the headlines of the news in the archives seems consistent with news from other sources. I don't see why this article would be any different.
More fabricated rubbish? |
And how do you know that is from another source?
Since the initial "report" came from "agency", I wouldn't mind betting this is the same.