Originally Posted by marc71178
And how exactly is this a "small" matter?
Maybe the reason cricinfo didn't report it is because it's a load of fabricated rubbish?
Since Cricinfo already had an article up about the matter before the game had finished, they probably did not see a reason to put another one up with a few words from the other on field umpire.
A load of fabricated rubbish? As I say, the headlines of the news in the archives seems consistent with news from other sources. I don't see why this article would be any different.
More fabricated rubbish?