[Swervy]

Originally Posted by Richard

How the hell is it irrelevant?
Why'd anyone WANT to hit someone unless they've been hit first?

Yes, I do, because I see no good reason for it.

Why? Because you're a typial "poor little females" sort of guy?

Oh, yeah? Funny how it hasn't happened already, then.

Well, all right, happy isn't appropriate and I'll change it, I'm never happy about hitting someone - but I am not unhappy, no.

You are going incredibly overboard, just like anyone else pathetic enough to endear to that ludicrous convention which has no basis in non-hypocritical fact.
The only possible basis appears to me to be "pick on someone your own size" syndrome, which I'm a big believer in - I don't like physical intimidation.
But, funnily enough, the outrage when a big guy hits a small guy isn't anywhere near the outrage when a small guy hits a small girl. As for if a big girl hits a small guy - well, it's practically non-existent. Oh, and another one - if a little guy hits a big guy, he's asking for it, yeah? So he can't be surprised if he gets whacked back. But if a small girl hits a small guy - oh, no, how dare he endeavour to strike even.
And all this ******** is for one reason - the typical modern-day sexism that females are in some way absolved from blame in physical confrontation - the same way so many guys have this sick obession with "bitch-fights".

I cant beleive you are trying to make me look like the unreasonable one here..quite unreal.

I dont think it would be a bad thing if this thread is closed...its got just too strange..you start off ticking off a well liked, well respected..and dare I say it (no offense intended LE!!!) well lived fella on here for coming out with a witty yet maybe off colour joke about one of the biggest cheats ever to walk onto an internation cricket ground,move onto smacking people in the face and then move on to the pleasures of hitting women and accuse me of being 'poor little females' kind of guy.

You are just too much