Originally Posted by MrPrez
It just sounds a bit like those lacking in cricket knowledge saying "OK, Steyn is the best in the world, and then Lasith Malinga is second. Why? Because he's awesome to watch."
Obviously that's an extreme example, but you get my point.
That's not what I said. I said he is great to watch, because he has a near flawless technique....which accounts for his success everywhere. Which is very different to "he's great because he's awesome to watch".