Originally Posted by L Trumper
Any reason why Hill is not rated as much as trumper? I heard Hill was a very quick scorer too. Also their records are similar and he is also part of the group along with Trumper that rebelled against board at that time. Is his playing style anyway considered vastly different than Victor's or something?
Mostly it was a style thing but also Trumper was considered a much better batsman on 'sticky wickets'.
Clem Hill had no doubt who was the better when he said
"as a batsman, I'm not fit to lick Vic's boots"